Former Speaker DeWeese expected to remain in prison
HARRISBURG — Former House Speaker Bill DeWeese likely will serve out the remainder of his prison term, because his appeals could drag on well beyond the end of his sentence, legal experts say.
There is an outside chance that DeWeese, 63, of Waynesburg would have a shot at freedom if he wins an appeal to a three-judge panel of Superior Court for a new trial on his 2012 theft conviction for using public resources for campaigns.
The longtime Greene County Democrat used his district office staff for campaigns, witnesses told jurors, and admitted that a state-paid aide sat just outside his Harrisburg office raising campaign money.
If he wins the right to a new trial — and if authorities decide not to retry him — he might have an opportunity to again run for office.
That's the best-case scenario. But law school professors say the prospect of winning such an appeal is unlikely.
“A big if,” said University of Pittsburgh professor John Burkoff, a legal expert.
“Whatever happens from this point on, there's every chance that DeWeese will have served all or most of his sentence by the time this is all over and done with,” Burkoff said.
DeWeese has served 13 months of a 2 1⁄2- to 5-year sentence in Retreat state prison. He needs to serve at least nine more months before becoming eligible for early release. His attorney, William Costopoulos, declined comment.
“If the Superior Court reverses his conviction — and that's a big if — the state is bound to appeal that reversal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court,” Burkoff said. “And that is generally not a lightning-quick process, to put it mildly. Less quick still if the Supreme Court actually agrees to hear the case. … As a result, it seems to me rather unlikely that, whatever happens on appeal, there will ever be a retrial in this case.”
The Attorney General's Office declined comment.
Wes Oliver, a Duquesne University Law School professor, said criminal appeals “are rarely successful. Without knowing the issues raised, I can't speculate on the odds of reversal in this case, but about 5 percent of criminal defendants receive some sort of relief in an appellate court.”
Most convicted defendants are not released on bail while an appeal is pending, Burkoff said.
“But certainly if the Superior Court reverses, Costopoulos can ask the trial court to release him on bail, pending action by the Supreme Court. And the trial court has the discretion to do that,” he said, but added that would not be the norm.
If DeWeese were retried and again convicted, “the person obviously gets credit for time served,” said Tom Place, who teaches criminal law at Penn State University's Dickinson Law School.
Only in rare circumstances could a new, longer sentence be imposed, Place said.
Another rare circumstance: An appeals court could declare the verdict “insufficient as a matter of law” and grant essentially an acquittal. Typically, verdicts are reversed because of trial error, Place said.
Yet there is some benefit to winning an appeal after serving one's sentence, Oliver said.
“You might think that the appellate court would say that the issue is moot, but courts have held that the collateral consequences of conviction — (such as) disenfranchisement, removal of right to own a gun, limits on international travel — permit the appellate court to reverse a conviction even if the defendant has served all his time.”
Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter.Reach him at 717-787-1405or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.