Group looks to galvanize Pittsburgh's black voters
The Western Pennsylvania Black Political Assembly is planning an aggressive campaign to organize black voters in Pittsburgh and force city leaders to improve the city's poorest neighborhoods.
Rick Adams, one of the assembly's officials, said the goal is to elect leaders who will work to reduce crime, substance abuse and unemployment, among other social and economic ills. The organization will formally announce its plans Saturday during a breakfast at Bidwell Presbyterian Church in Manchester. It also will honor 10 residents for community service.
“We feel there needs to be a citywide and countywide strategy for the community to address those issues,” Adams said. “We think the most powerful way to approach problems in the community is to, in effect, take a consensus.”
To do that, the assembly is planning the District Precinct Organizing Project. It would recruit two people from predominantly black voting precincts to encourage voter registration and participation and seek consensus from residents on the best ways to address problems plaguing city neighborhoods.
One of the long-range goals is to abolish the practice of purging people from voter registration rolls after a long period of inactivity. Adams said he would also like to create a way in which black voters would be automatically registered when they turn 18, but he is unsure how that might work.
“That's just an idea at this point,” he said.
Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.