Corbett selects Stevens to fill vacancy on Supreme Court
HARRISBURG — A state appeals court judge, Correale F. Stevens, was selected on Thursday as Gov. Tom Corbett's nominee to temporarily fill a vacancy on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
The governor announced his decision more than a month after the opening was created following the resignation from the bench of Joan Orie Melvin. Melvin was convicted of using public employees to help her political campaigns.
Stevens, a Republican, is currently president judge of state Superior Court, which handles criminal and civil appeals, and where he has served since 1998. He needs a two-thirds vote by the state Senate to take a seat on the high court bench after approval by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
If he is confirmed, he will return the court to a four-to-three Republican majority and would serve until January 2016. In November 2015, voters will pick a permanent replacement to serve a 10-year term on the court.
The Republican governor said in a statement that he will send the nomination to the Senate on Friday.
Stevens, 66, of Sugarloaf in Luzerne County thanked Corbett.
“It would become an exciting opportunity for me to continue my judicial career in that capacity, if confirmed by the Pennsylvania Senate,” Stevens said in a statement. He noted that he has served on the Superior Court with four of the six current Supreme Court justices.
The next step for Stevens will be to meet with committee members as he continues his duties on the Superior Court.
Stevens is a familiar face in Pennsylvania politics and government. His long career in public service also includes time as Luzerne County's district attorney, a county judge and seven years as a state representative.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.