3 killed in crash near Allentown; 4th person hurt
ALLENTOWN — Two brothers and an uncle died in a two-car crash late Sunday while making a convenience-store run a short distance from their home, authorities said.
Kenneth Marcks, 35, his brother Chad Fluck, 23, who was driving, and uncle Thomas Fallstich, 46, were identified as the victims. The crash occurred about 10 blocks from the home they shared in Salisbury Township, outside Allentown.
The driver of the second car was hospitalized with injuries that were not believed to be life-threatening.
Speed appeared to play a role in the crash, Allentown police Capt. Glen Dorney said.
An accident reconstruction team is trying to determine exactly what happened.
Monday would have been Marcks' 13th wedding anniversary.
He had lost his job as a forklift operator but was scheduled to have a job interview Monday, said his wife, Amanda. They have four children, 6 to 14.
Amanda Marcks said the three men left home for a convenience store up the street, a trip they made regularly.
“They were supposed to come right back. But they didn't come back,” she told The Express-Times newspaper of Easton.
The three victims lived with seven other family members in the home of Donna Marcks, the brothers' mother.
Fluck, who had been working as a welder, had been hurt on the job and was on leave.
“They were good people who would do anything for anybody,” Donna Marcks said. “If somebody needed help, they would be there.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.