Share This Page

Philadelphia-based Aramark gets contract to feed Ohio's inmates

| Saturday, June 22, 2013, 5:03 p.m.

COLUMBUS — Ohio is turning over the feeding of its about 50,000 prison inmates to a private company in an attempt to save $14 million annually in the face of budget deficits, the Department of Rehabilitation and Correction announced on Friday.

Philadelphia-based Aramark won the two-year contract with a bid to spend about $3.61 per day per inmate, the state said.

The announcement occurred almost exactly two years since Gov. John Kasich signed a bill into law meant to reduce the prison population to save millions.

Instead, the state says the numbers are growing beyond its estimates, one of several reasons it's looking for savings.

The state could house as many as 52,100 inmates by the end of the next two-year budget cycle in June 2015, JoEllen Smith, a Department of Rehabilitation and Correction spokeswoman, said Friday. That's 1,200 above projections.

That's several thousand inmates above figures estimated by the state in 2011 as the overhaul law was being debated. That estimate said Ohio would house as few as 47,000 by inmates by 2015 if the bill passed.

The prison system is trying to figure out why the population is growing in spite of the law and what can be done about it, Smith said.

The agency determined in February that the number of inmates returning to Ohio prisons upon release has hit a new low.

But it found the number of people serving time for drug and property offenses has risen despite efforts established in the 2011 sentencing law to reduce the numbers of low-level offenders behind bars.

Aramark's $110 million contract starts Sept. 8 and runs through June 30, 2015, with an option to extend that for two two-year budget cycles.

The savings in the contract will help the prison system deal with a $60 million shortfall, Smith said.

Increases in workers comp rates, health insurance premiums, medical and drug expenses, the increase in inmate population and other issues are driving the budget gap.

More than 230 of the agency's 433 food service workers have moved to other positions within the system, and the system is trying to find places for as many of the remaining workers as possible, Smith said.

Prisons director Gary Mohr “remains committed to meeting our budget without closing any housing units or laying off security staff,” Smith said in a statement.

The union representing prison guards criticized the announcement, saying it had offered a competitive proposal to keep food service in-house while saving money.

The move means untrained food service workers replacing union employees trained to deal with prison security issues in addition to their kitchen duties, said Christopher Mabe, president of the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association.

“It leads to the possibility of very violent, dangerous situations,” Mabe said.

Indiana, Kansas and Kentucky are among states that have privatized their prison food service operations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.