Donations to PSU bounce back
STATE COLLEGE — Penn State said on Monday its fundraising efforts rebounded last year after a drop-off in donations followed the arrest of former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky on child molestation charges.
Total alumni giving reached nearly $88 million in the year that ended in June, up from about $71 million a year earlier but still down from $131 million in 2010-11. That year, a major donation for the school's ice hockey program caused a spike in total donations.
The total number of donors rose to an all-time high of about 193,000, and the school was 92 percent of the way toward meeting a $2 billion goal for a campaign that began in 2007. “For the Future: The Campaign for Penn State Students” has raised $400 million for facilities and $688 million toward the endowment, in addition to hundreds of millions of additional funds.
Rod Kirsch, vice president for development and alumni relations, said giving to the university remained solid despite the Sandusky scandal, a transition to a new president, a rough national economy and uncertainty about federal tax laws.
“The resiliency and commitment of the Penn State family is pretty remarkable,” Kirsch said. “A lot of universities would love to have a base of 193,000 donors.”
Total receipts, a measure of how much the money the university ends up collecting, amounted to about $238 million last year, an increase of $29 million from a year earlier.
The arrest of Sandusky and two university administrators in November 2011 was followed last summer by Sandusky's conviction and the release of a damning report, commissioned by Penn State, about how the school handled complaints about the former coach's encounters with children.
The school's trustees are meeting at Penn State Fayette on Friday, which will mark a year since the release of the Freeh report, as it has become known.
Some alumni have objected to how the school handled the Freeh report, which was critical of the actions by former head coach Joe Paterno, who died of lung cancer in January 2012.
Others have criticized the university's consent agreement with the NCAA, made a year ago, that avoided a complete ban on football but kept the football team out of post-season play for four years, and required a $60 million fine, among other things.
Sandusky is serving a lengthy prison sentence and pursuing appeals. Former administrators Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, and former school president Graham Spanier, await trial for an alleged cover-up of Sandusky complaints, charges they all deny.
Kirsch said fundraising has been resilient despite the two years of negative publicity and turmoil.
“There has been a lot of noise on a variety of items,” Kirsch said. “But at the end of the day I think you ultimately go back to resiliency.”
“The proof is in the numbers, and the numbers have remained very strong here,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Centre County entrepreneur with ‘new ideas’ named to LCB board
- Troopers hurt while busting alleged drunken driver