TribLIVE

| State

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Plaintiffs call last witnesses in voter-ID trial

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Wednesday, July 24, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
 

HARRISBURG — Plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's voter identification law presented their final witnesses Tuesday in an effort to convince a state judge that it cannot be implemented without disenfranchising large numbers of voters.

Three witnesses — all older women who no longer have driver's licenses and rely mainly on relatives and friends for transportation — testified in video recordings played before Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs say the yet-to-be-enforced mandatory photo ID requirement, one of the strictest in the nation, would discourage many such people from exercising their right to vote. State officials say any registered voter who lacks an acceptable ID can get a special Pennsylvania Department of State voting-only ID for free through the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.

One of the video witnesses, Patricia Norton, 73, testified that she gave up trying to get a free photo ID prior to last year's presidential election because of an unpleasant encounter with a PennDOT clerk and chronic back pain that requires her to use a wheelchair or a walker.

Norton, who has lived in the Berks County borough of Womelsdorf for nearly a half-century, said a friend drove her on the 45-minute trip to the PennDOT licensing center in Shillington. The clerk said Norton would have to pay $13.50 for a non-driver ID card but, when she tried to pay in cash, the clerk said only a check or money order was acceptable. Lacking either, Norton left empty-handed.

“I was very frustrated,” she said. “It was a painful trip, and she was not a happy helper.”

Echoing other homebound seniors who have testified in the case, Norton said she is uncomfortable “imposing on people” for rides. She said she also has misgivings about casting an absentee ballot, which would get around the photo ID requirement, and prefers to vote in person.

“I want to make sure that I'm being counted,” she said.

Other witnesses included Susan Carty, the newly elected president of the Pennsylvania League of Women Voters, who said she detected “great confusion” about the law in last fall's election while fielding calls to a Philadelphia TV station's election hotline.

The state's lawyers planned to open its case Wednesday, and the trial was scheduled to continue at least through next Tuesday.

McGinley recessed the court at midday Tuesday because of a scheduling conflict.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Pennsylvania

  1. Philadelphia U.S. Rep. Fattah indicted in racketeering case
  2. Medical pot has advocate in Pennsylvania House
  3. Teen could spend 10 years in prison for role in injuring Ohio teacher
  4. Probe continues in fatal shooting in Sharon hospital parking lot
  5. Pennsylvania court rules police videos are public records
  6. Fight for equal access continues 25 years after ADA signed
  7. Mercer boy hospitalized after car he was driving crashes
  8. Boy youngest to receive double-hand transplant in Philadelphia