Gov. Corbett's office to allow attorney to write column
Gov. Tom Corbett's office has reversed a decision by the state Liquor Control Board that barred one of its attorneys from writing a liquor law column for The Legal Intelligencer.
Corbett's Office of Administration ruled that Alan Kennedy-Shaffer, 28, can pen the quarterly column for the Philadelphia-based law journal as long as he submits a final draft for LCB approval before publication and does not represent his opinions as the LCB's positions.
“Inasmuch as you are employed as an attorney with the PLCB and, as such, are privy to matters involving the PLCB, the Office of Administration is concerned that your writings may create actual or perceived conflicts of interest...” the approval letter states.
The letter goes on to say that, consequently, Kennedy-Shaffer “must be particularly vigilant to avoid all conflicts with the obligations of your public employment and your duties as an attorney.”
Kennedy-Shaffer, of Harrisburg, filed an appeal in late June arguing the agency was violating his right to free speech when it denied his request to write the column without pay. The LCB said the column would conflict with his job responsibilities and could breach attorney-client privilege.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.