TribLIVE

| State

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Judge in Pa. voter ID trial holds private hearing

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Tuesday, July 30, 2013, 10:09 p.m.
 

HARRISBURG — The judge in Pennsylvania's voter-identification law trial cleared the courtroom Tuesday so lawyers could spar in private over how many voters may have been unable to obtain an acceptable photo ID before last year's election.

Lawyers plan to make closing arguments before Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley on Wednesday, the 11th day of the trial on the constitutionality of the yet-to-be-enforced law.

The closed hearing involved 144 voters who were on a Pennsylvania Department of State spreadsheet of about 600 who applied for an ID at PennDOT licensing centers but did not obtain a free, voting-only license designed by the Department of State. Those IDs, under rules streamlined in late September, are supposed to be readily available to registered voters.

Jonathan Marks, a high-ranking state election official, testified that the 144 voters should not have been on the list because they all qualified for — and obtained — other types of acceptable photo IDs, although he said he did not know the circumstances of those cases.

Marks stressed that the spreadsheet was designed as an internal tool to track the flow of the special IDs and that the most common reason they are delayed is a lack of verification that the applicant is a registered voter.

The state has issued more than 3,800 of the special IDs so far, Marks said.

In an 11th-hour move at the end of Tuesday's session, the plaintiffs' lawyers sought to call a statistical analyst as a witness to rebut Marks' testimony, but the state objected and McGinley ordered the private hearing.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Pennsylvania

  1. Lawrence power plant being converted to gas from coal
  2. 2001 same-sex union recognized despite partner’s death
  3. Pennsylvania Senator Casey pushes for railroad bridge inspectors
  4. Va. trucker hit  Mega Millions jackpot in Pa.
  5. Medical pot has advocate in Pennsylvania House
  6. Evidence for charge not found in Pa. case
  7. Teen could spend 10 years in prison for role in injuring Ohio teacher
  8. Pa. man gets life in prison for girlfriend’s ‘obscene’ slaying
  9. Probe continues in fatal shooting in Sharon hospital parking lot