Lawyers sum up their cases in Pa. voter ID trial
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Lawyers summed up their cases to cap the 12-day trial of Pennsylvania's tough voter-identification law.
Attorney for plaintiffs seeking to overturn the mandatory photo ID requirement and for the state were given an hour Thursday each to make closing arguments before Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley.
There's no word when McGinley will rule.
Jennifer Clarke of Philadelphia's Public Interest Law Center, a member of the plaintiffs' legal team, said the law “unreasonably and unnecessarily” interferes with the right to vote. She cited estimates that hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians lack proper IDs and told McGinley, “it's time to put an end to this.”
Arguing for the state, Philadelphia lawyer Alicia Hickok said the plaintiffs failed to show that the law is unconstitutional and said there are ample opportunities for any voter to get an acceptable ID at no cost.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- New Castle man gets prison for rape of girl seen on flea market tablet computer
- Bigger version of Dutch artist’s giant rubber duck coming to Philadelphia
- Pope to join gallery of murals in Philadelphia
- Pa. Gov. Wolf proposes to add $28M a year for human services
- Pa. business sector tells GOP committee of worries about minimum wage, taxes, pensions
- Man claiming 1988 abuse by Sandusky seeks way into court
- Greene County woman found dead in burning home
- Massive coal breaker, Pennsylvania’s last, is coming down
- Nonprofits in Pa. barely break even, survey finds
- Congressman rejects calls for recusal over romance with lobbyist
- Penn State fraternity suspended for 3 years