Lawyers sum up their cases in Pa. voter ID trial
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Lawyers summed up their cases to cap the 12-day trial of Pennsylvania's tough voter-identification law.
Attorney for plaintiffs seeking to overturn the mandatory photo ID requirement and for the state were given an hour Thursday each to make closing arguments before Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley.
There's no word when McGinley will rule.
Jennifer Clarke of Philadelphia's Public Interest Law Center, a member of the plaintiffs' legal team, said the law “unreasonably and unnecessarily” interferes with the right to vote. She cited estimates that hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians lack proper IDs and told McGinley, “it's time to put an end to this.”
Arguing for the state, Philadelphia lawyer Alicia Hickok said the plaintiffs failed to show that the law is unconstitutional and said there are ample opportunities for any voter to get an acceptable ID at no cost.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Four veterinarians charged for doping race horses at Penn National
- PSU frat members, victims aid in investigation
- Authorities investigate racist letter to Pa. state police pick Brown
- PennDOT turns to roundabout intersections, citing safety, cost
- PSU president will back tuition freeze if Wolf’s funding plan passes
- VA pledges to ease restrictive rules on use of Veterans Choice Access program
- Pa. police officer charged with homicide for shooting unarmed man in back
- Heat lamp for cats caused fatal Lawrence County fire
- Treasure of World War II posters comes to light at Grove City College
- Landowners leery of Sunbury Pipeline project
- Man, 82, dies in Lawrence County house fire