Lawyers sum up their cases in Pa. voter ID trial
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Lawyers summed up their cases to cap the 12-day trial of Pennsylvania's tough voter-identification law.
Attorney for plaintiffs seeking to overturn the mandatory photo ID requirement and for the state were given an hour Thursday each to make closing arguments before Commonwealth Court Judge Bernard McGinley.
There's no word when McGinley will rule.
Jennifer Clarke of Philadelphia's Public Interest Law Center, a member of the plaintiffs' legal team, said the law “unreasonably and unnecessarily” interferes with the right to vote. She cited estimates that hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians lack proper IDs and told McGinley, “it's time to put an end to this.”
Arguing for the state, Philadelphia lawyer Alicia Hickok said the plaintiffs failed to show that the law is unconstitutional and said there are ample opportunities for any voter to get an acceptable ID at no cost.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Republican legislator estimates selling state liquor system could net $1B
- Phiadelphia police commissioner urges caution after shootings of officers
- Reading deals with ‘ugly’ tree saga
- Liquor Control Board, Pennsylvania universities target problem drinking
- Licensing boards increase fees to cover costs that include investigations
- Secret Santa saves the day for York County senior center residents
- PSU employee kicks cancer, picks up degree
- Erie man charged with 1990 slaying of Virginia Beach woman
- State lottery scratch-off tickets bring instant cheer as holiday gifts
- Enrollment in Pennsylvania’s Medicaid expansion kicks off with a few hiccups
- Most Penn State trustees boycott special meeting on legal action against football program