ShareThis Page

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kane denies interest in running for governor in 2014

| Monday, Aug. 5, 2013, 11:27 p.m.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane last year dismissed a case against former confidential informant, Tyron B. Ali, contending the investigation by her predecessors was legally flawed, tainted with racism, and inactive for nine months before she took office in January 2013.

State Attorney General Kathleen Kane has no interest in jumping into the 2014 gubernatorial race, despite political encouragement and recent speculation to the contrary, she said on Monday.

“I love my job as attorney general. I think it's the right time and the right place for me right now to represent the people of Pennsylvania,” Kane said in brief remarks to reporters in the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, Downtown. She was a keynote speaker at the annual conference of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives.

About seven months into her term, political analysts have speculated whether Kane might join at least a half-dozen Democratic hopefuls to seek their party's nomination for governor next year. Observers point to her political savvy, fundraising record and high-profile refusal this summer to defend the state's ban on same-sex marriage.

It doesn't hurt that Kane has tangled with the administration of Republican Gov. Tom Corbett and promised to carry on the prosecution of the former Penn State University administrators accused of failing to disclose what they knew about Jerry Sandusky, convicted of child sexual abuse, analysts say.

“The attorney general's office in any state has become a stepping stone for the governorship. I'm sure that's part of the speculation,” said Jeff Brauer, a political science professor at Keystone College near Scranton. “The other part is her being the first elected woman attorney general as well as the first elected Democratic attorney general in Pennsylvania.”

Kane did not say who has nudged her to run in 2014, though she indicated having “quite a bit” of encouragement. A call to the state Democratic Party office in Harrisburg went unreturned Monday.

Since her run against Republican David Freed in 2012, Kane has pledged to serve a full four-year term as attorney general. She cast herself Monday not as a Democratic or a woman attorney general but as “your attorney general.”

“I have always said there is no place for politics when it comes to the law,” she said. “I still believe that.”

Although Corbett has seen relatively low public-approval numbers, other political experts warned it's too early to discount his re-election bid. Every elected governor in Pennsylvania since 1970 has won re-election.

Corbett will enjoy incumbency and substantial resources as he runs again, said Stephen Cimbala, a Penn State professor of political science.

“I don't think very many Republicans are going to desert him to vote for a Democrat unless it's a Democrat with bipartisan appeal,” Cimbala said.

Still, he and other observers said Kane could be a powerful gubernatorial candidate in 2018.

“Everything she's done during (her) campaign and in office has been of fairly high profile,” said Chris Borick, director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion in Allentown. “She doesn't shy away from the spotlight.”

Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5676 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.