ShareThis Page

Pennsylvania House conservatives flex political muscle

| Saturday, Aug. 10, 2013, 7:42 p.m.

HARRISBURG — Unlike the Timber Caucus or the Italian-American Caucus, the more conservative Republican members of the Pennsylvania House aren't formally organized, but they have something better: raw numbers and political power.

Their ranks constitute a controlling portion of the House Republicans' 111-seat majority, giving them enough leverage to put the brakes on a transportation and transit funding initiative this summer even though it was supported by their natural ally, Gov. Tom Corbett.

Pennsylvania may be a swing state, with one U.S. senator from each party and a recent history of voting for President Obama twice and electing Democrats as attorney general and auditor general, but the conservative majority of the House GOP caucus has proven that it can win elections and get results in the state Capitol.

It's been three years since House Republicans retook the majority in the Tea Party wave that ushered into office fellow Republican Corbett. Since then, there have been three on-time state budgets, no new broad-based state taxes and little growth in the state budget.

The GOP conservatives have been key players in passage of Marcellus shale regulations and an impact fee far friendlier to the industry than others had supported, a voter identification requirement that's being challenged in state court, the castle doctrine self-defense law and tougher regulations for abortion clinics.

They have been particularly effective in preventing things they oppose, including gun restrictions in response to the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., and expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.

The question now is whether they have found a winning formula for successful governance or have sown the seeds of eventual downfall.

Their hostility to new taxes doomed the transportation bill, but it also meant the failure of liquor system privatization, a priority of the governor's that they strongly support. In doing so, they embarrassed Corbett in the run-up to next year's re-election campaign.

“There are a multitude of other, smaller things that we've stopped, usually within the context of informal discussions,” said Rep. Stephen Bloom, R-Cumberland, a lawyer and author of the book “They've Crossed the Line: A Patriot's Guide to Religious Freedom.”

Bloom recently sought support for a bill that would direct public school administrators to help teachers “present the science curriculum as it addresses scientific controversies” and keep them from stopping teachers “from helping students understand, analyze, critique and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories.”

As a former Messiah College instructor and evangelical Christian, Bloom considers himself a creationist, and some have seen his proposal as a back-door way to allow creationism to be taught in public schools. Other members of the House GOP conservative wing have organized gun rights rallies, spoken out against gay marriage and sponsored “year of the Bible” and “national fast day” resolutions.

Those sorts of things play well to their base but may not be helpful to Corbett as he courts moderate Democrats and independents next year.

“I have to represent the people in my district, so that is my main concern,” said Rep. RoseMarie Swanger, R-Lebanon, who has sponsored a bill called American Law for American Courts to prevent Pennsylvania judges from considering any foreign laws as they make decisions. “Certainly I want to keep the governorship, but I take the title ‘representative' very seriously, and I'm always trying to gauge what my constituents want.”

Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Butler, a 15-year House member and proud arch-conservative, said Corbett's allies may have done him a favor by turning against a transportation package expected to raise gasoline prices by a quarter or more.

That proposal, along with the Marcellus shale levy, the delay in the phase-out of a business tax program and trickle-down tax increases by cash-strapped school districts, have given ammunition to Corbett's opponents, who argue he has violated his often-stated categorical opposition to new taxes.

“I was shocked that Tom pushed forward with it,” Metcalfe said. “I think he's chosen a fight that, no matter which way it went, he would be on the hook for it.”

Mark Scolforo covers state government for The Associated Press in Harrisburg. He can be reached at Follow him on Twitter: @houseofbuddy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.