Pa. interstates are nation's 8th busiest
Pennsylvania's interstates are the eighth busiest in the nation but don't come close to the number of cars on California's highways, a federal study released Monday shows.
The Federal Highway Administration compared 2011 data collected from all 50 states and found that people traveled 84.7 billion miles on California's interstates that year. Texas was second, with 55.7 billion miles traveled; Florida was third, with 34.7 billion miles traveled.
Pennsylvania reported 23.7 billion miles traveled.
“It's not surprising. The Keystone name is very fitting. You have to travel through Pennsylvania to get anywhere in the Northeast,” said Steve Chizmar, PennDOT spokesman. “When you look at the miles traveled and where we are in funding, clearly more needs to be done.”
PennDOT is evaluating weight restrictions on bridges. Lawmakers failed to pass a bill that would have allocated additional money to fix deteriorating bridges and other infrastructure. Some lawmakers suggest PennDOT should pay for the fixes out of its existing $7 billion budget.
Within the state, the study shows the turnpike is the most heavily traveled road, with more than 4.3 billion miles traveled, followed by Interstate 81 with 3.6 billion miles and Interstate 80 with 3.3 billion.
Such studies “serve as a tool to target efforts to solve congestion issues, improve road design, address mobility challenges and increases educational efforts,” said Bevi Powell, AAA spokeswoman for the Pittsburgh region.
The data from the states came from electronic traffic counters on interstates.
Bobby Kerlik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7886 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Priest: Mourners in ‘disbelief’ at Pennsylvania trooper’s death
- Centre County entrepreneur with ‘new ideas’ named to LCB board
- Police: Ambush suspect was military re-enactor
- Manchin, Toomey to seek greater flexibility for veterans’ career counselors
- ‘Racy’ emails could stay hidden under Pennsylvania open records law
- Comcast cuts showings of anti-pigeon shooting commercial featuring Barker
- Police: Suspect Frein in Pa. trooper ambush ‘extremely dangerous’