Washington native to attend Medal of Honor winners' convention
Walter “Joe” Marm Jr., the only living Western Pennsylvania native to be awarded the Medal of Honor, will be among the 48 medal recipients gathering in Gettysburg this week for the Congressional Medal of Honor Society's annual convention.
Marm, 71, is a native of Washington. He received his Medal of Honor from President Lyndon Johnson on Dec. 19, 1966, for valor when his platoon came under intense enemy fire during the Vietnam War. He retired from the Army as a colonel in 1995 and resides in Fremont, N.C.
Convention officials said Gettysburg was selected because of its links to the military's top honor, which was established during President Abraham Lincoln's administration.
A number of public events, including some that require tickets, will be held during the five-day convention, including:
• 10 a.m. — A ceremony to place a marker commemorating the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, which resulted in 63 Medals of Honor being bestowed for valor. Lincoln Square. No tickets required.
• 2:30 to 4:30 p.m. — An autograph- signing session featuring Medal of Honor recipients. Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel. Tickets required.
• 10 a.m. to noon — Town Hall Forum featuring Medal of Honor recipients, moderated by Fox News journalist Chris Wallace. Gettysburg College campus. Tickets required.
• 7 to 9:30 p.m. — Concert featuring the Marine Corps Band and the West Point Cadet Glee Club. Gettysburg Battlefield, Pennsylvania Monument. Tickets required.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.