Scranton priest admits to sex acts with boy, 15, inside car
SCRANTON — A Catholic priest whose ministry included counseling troubled youths was charged in northeastern Pennsylvania when police say he admitted to sex acts with a 15-year-old boy.
The Rev. William Paulish was in Lackawanna County prison, unable to post $50,000 bail on Friday. The charges include corruption of a minor, indecent exposure, unlawful contact with a minor, indecent assault and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a person under 16. Court records did not list a lawyer for Paulish.
The Times-Tribune of Scranton reported that Paulish, 56, has been reassigned 15 times by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Scranton since being ordained in 1988 and has had three leaves of absence.
The diocese did not respond to the newspaper's requests to explain the reassignments and absences. In a press release, the diocese said it removed Paulish from his assignment as assistant pastor at Prince of Peace Parish in Old Forge and suspended his ability to work as a priest.
Paulish and the boy were caught by Dunmore police when Penn State Worthington Scranton security guards reported the priest's car as suspicious on seeing it on Thursday night parked near the tennis courts.
The boy did not have pants on when police arrived, and both later admitted to performing sex acts, police said. Paulish told investigators that he arranged the meeting through an ad he had posted on Craigslist, police said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.