Spanier: Hold off on my lawsuit
HARRISBURG — Former Penn State President Graham Spanier wants a judge to put his planned defamation lawsuit against former FBI Director Louis Freeh on hold until after Spanier's criminal trial in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal.
In Centre County court papers posted online Monday, Spanier's lawyers contend that moving forward on the civil case now would undercut it. They wrote that people who are potential witnesses in both cases might assert their right against self-incrimination and refuse to testify if the still-unscheduled criminal trial is pending.
“There is no reason not to stay this action pending the resolution of the criminal trial,” the attorneys wrote in the court papers filed in Bellefonte.
Penn State's trustees hired Freeh to conduct an internal investigation of the Sandusky matter. In a highly critical July 2012 report, Freeh concluded that Spanier, football coach Joe Paterno and other high-ranking university administrators failed to protect children against Sandusky, a former assistant football coach who is serving a 30- to 60-year prison term.
Spanier initiated a lawsuit on the day before the anniversary of Freeh's report, complying with a state law that gives people who believe they have been libeled or defamed one year to initiate a civil suit.
But Spanier has provided few details about the planned lawsuit. He has yet to file an actual complaint and is asking the court to defer any requirement that he do so until after the criminal proceeding is concluded.
Freeh, a former federal judge, called Spanier's court filings “self-serving” and said he objects to any delay in the filing of Spanier's complaint.
“This baseless notice of claim should be presented in a court of law rather than hyped in Spanier's media campaign,” he said in a written response.
In the latest filing, Spanier's lawyers disputed Freeh's finding that Spanier and the other administrators repeatedly withheld critical facts from authorities.
“Spanier did not once conceal facts about Sandusky's child abuse, let alone ‘repeatedly,' ” they said.
Freeh noted that Spanier had been removed as Penn State's president before Freeh was hired to investigate.
“That investigation uncovered emails by Spanier which are now part of the evidence in his felony criminal prosecution for false statements and for failing to report Sandusky, a serial pedophile, to law enforcement authorities,” Freeh said. “The law provides serious consequences for bringing any action in bad faith, which I will pursue to the fullest extent.”
Spanier, former vice president Gary Schultz and former athletic director Tim Curley are charged in what prosecutors say was a criminal cover-up of complaints about Sandusky. Paterno died of lung cancer in January 2012.
Spanier's lawyer did not respond Monday to a phone message seeking comment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.