Toomey pushed to back anti-discrimination bill
PHILADELPHIA — Gay rights groups are asking Republican Sen. Pat Toomey to support a bill that aims to ban workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.
A key vote on the bill is scheduled for Monday in Washington, and one more vote is needed for it to move forward in the Senate, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or ENDA, is a top priority for gay rights groups.
State Rep. Brian Sims, a Philadelphia Democrat who is gay, wrote Toomey an open letter on Friday urging him to support the bill, saying it would give gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered individuals the same protections as other groups.
“I believe that there is no single piece of civil rights legislation in existence that is more impactful to members of the LGBT community,” Sims wrote in the letter.
A spokesman for Toomey said the senator is undecided. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. supports the measure.
Heritage Action, the political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, urged senators on Friday to vote against the bill, the newspaper reported. The group warned that the measure would force business owners to “adopt the government's values,” “severely undermine civil liberties, increase government interference in the labor market, and trample on religious liberty.”
The bill has little chance of passage in the Republican-majority House of Representatives, so Toomey's vote in the Senate is mostly symbolic.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.