ShareThis Page

Pa. food banks worry about effect of cut in food stamps

| Monday, Nov. 4, 2013, 8:21 p.m.

HARRISBURG — Food pantry organizers and others who help feed Pennsylvania's hungry are bracing for the effects of reduced federal funding for food stamps, with some wondering how their organizations are going to find the donors or volunteers to fill the gap.

The reduction took effect on Friday. It means a 5 percent drop in the $80 billion-a-year federal program or about $36 less a month for a family of four, down to $632 a month. That will translate to a loss of about 20 meals a month for a family of four, said Joe Arthur of the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank. In Pennsylvania, 1.8 million people receive food stamps.

“People are going to be hurting because of this,” Arthur said. “There's no doubt in my mind that some families are going to be hungrier.”

The reduction is a result of the expiration of a temporary benefit in the 2009 stimulus. U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, a Democrat, is pressing for legislation that would extend the benefit another year. But the debate in Congress is going the other way, with a bill passed by the GOP-controlled House that would cut food stamps an additional $4 billion annually and the Democratic-controlled Senate proposing a cut of one-tenth of that amount.

“It just befuddles me that people can vote down food stamps,” said Sister Sandra Lyons, director of the Bernadine Center in Chester, where dozens of families come for hot meals and foodstuffs from the pantry there.

Lyons, who chairs a Delaware County interfaith network of 12 food pantries, said the groups have been sending letters to members of Congress advocating for food aid, so far without luck.

She, like others, expect more people to come in search of a meal at a time when the recession has left a donor network stretched thin and people in need more than ever.

The cost of food is rising, governments are cutting assistance programs, middle-class families can't donate as much, more people in low-wage jobs can't make ends meet and cost-conscious food manufacturers have less to donate, say food pantry organizers.

As a result, the food pantry system that used to be an emergency network is now a supplemental part of how Americans are fed, especially as food stamp aid is reduced, Arthur said.

“We will appeal to our donors. We will do whatever we can to raise more food and more funding to at least mitigate the effect, but my honest assessment is that ... I just don't think the charitable food network can make it up,” Arthur said.

The cut means a loss of $183 million a year in food subsidies in the state, Arthur said. In 2012, nearly 870,000 Pennsylvania households had an average monthly benefit of $266.

Pastor Rick Crocker, whose Erie City Mission kitchen prepares 400 to 450 meals a day, said he expects higher demand at both the organization's public meal and food pantry mission, and he anticipates that his organization will find a way to meet it.

“I'm expecting through the generosity and kindness of people who support this ministry that we will be able to do so, even with increased demand,” Crocker said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.