Gettysburg attorney charged with stealing millions from clients
A Central Pennsylvania attorney was charged with defrauding eight clients out of more than $3 million since 2007 and has agreed to plead guilty, according to her attorney and federal court records.
The wire fraud charges were announced on Monday against Wendy Weikal-Beauchat, 46, whose Gettysburg practice centered on estate and long-term care planning. Weikal-Beauchat allegedly stole her clients' money and hid that by sending clients bogus certificates of deposit and federal tax forms that falsely showed interest the accounts were earning. According to the charges, some of her clients were elderly and at least one was suffering from dementia.
Weikal-Beauchat agreed to be disbarred in February, according to Pennsylvania Supreme Court records, and federal court records show she signed an agreement last month to plead guilty to the charges. A court date hasn't been set, though her defense attorney, Joseph Sembrot, said he expects that to occur soon.
“She made mistakes, she understands that,” Sembrot said. “Her goal is to help, at this point, as best she can those people she hurt: her clients and family members.”
The plea agreement lists only eight clients, but efforts are ongoing to find other clients whom Weikal-Beauchat might have victimized, Harrisburg-based U.S. Attorney Peter Smith said.
The attorney kept nearly $16.5 million of her clients' money in an account, and had more than 100 clients, according to court papers filed Monday. Alleged victims are identified only by their initials in court papers. Federal prosecutors have identified $6 million that Weikal-Beauchat must forfeit as part of the criminal investigation.
“The court has a certain amount of money right now in an account that has been frozen. Whether that's going to be sufficient to satisfy the victims in this case, I don't know,” Sembrot said. He declined to comment more specifically on the ongoing investigation or the likelihood more victims will be identified.
Sembrot couldn't provide a motive for his client's actions.
“I've seen no evidence of any of the problems that one would normally think of in this kind of case, like gambling or drugs,” Sembrot said. “It's a truly unfortunate set of circumstances that have caused and will cause her more trying circumstances down the road.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.