Pa. lawmaker tells how he declined bizarre cash offer made in Rotunda
HARRISBURG — In a darkened hallway above the Capitol Rotunda, a lobbyist pulled out an envelope containing $1,000 and offered it to a stunned Rep. Angel Cruz.
Turns out the lobbyist whose advances he refused was phony, Cruz later learned: Philadelphian Tyron B. Ali, a native of Trinidad, was wearing a wire and working undercover for the Attorney General's Office while lobbying in 2010 on behalf of a fictitious West Indian group that opposed a voter ID law.
Cruz, like nearly all House Democrats, planned to vote against the bill anyway. He'd talked with Ali before, but he said he never accepts cash.
“It was the first and hopefully the last time” anyone offers money, Cruz said.
Cruz, of Philadelphia, talked with the Tribune-Review outside his office, not far from where the bizarre encounter took place, as the House ethics committee took testimony from a former state prosecutor about four Philadelphia lawmakers who allegedly accepted cash payoffs.
Frank Fina, former chief deputy attorney general, ran the nearly three-year sting operation that fell by the wayside when Attorney General Kathleen Kane became the first Democrat to assume the office in January 2013.
Kane gave final approval to dismiss 2,088 criminal charges against Ali, which prosecutors had used as leverage to secure his cooperation. Kane contends that Fina effectively approved the dismissal weeks before she took over.
The GOP-controlled Legislature eventually sent the voter ID bill to Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, who signed it. A court challenge to the law is pending.
Ali's attorney, Robert Levant, declined to comment.
Cruz and at least one other lawmaker targeted in the sting stand in contrast to lawmakers charged with corruption in recent years. Eleven of 15 lawmakers accused of crimes since 2007 have been convicted.
“What's lost in the (news) coverage is you had some members who acted appropriately, and we should focus on them as well as others,” said Sen. Rob Teplitz, D-Dauphin County, co-chairman of a Senate-House reform caucus.
“I think it's commendable what he did,” Rep. Mike Reese, R-Mt. Pleasant Township, said of Cruz. “I think it showed leadership.”
Rep. Rosita Youngblood, D-Philadelphia, said Ali attended her 2011 fundraiser at Finnegan's Wake in her hometown. He gave her a $400 check — asked for nothing in return — and she reported the monetary gift to the state elections bureau. Youngblood asked an aide to write Ali a receipt for the money.
“I just didn't like him,” Youngblood said. “It was his whole demeanor.”
Unlike other instances, Ali apparently didn't record their encounter.
It appears to be one example of Ali's attempts to gain acceptance, to be seen at legislative events without offering cash.
The Philadelphia Inquirer last month reported four Democrats accepted cash: Rep. Ronald Waters, $7,650; Rep. Vanessa Brown, $4,000; Rep. Louise Bishop, $1,500; and Rep. Michelle Brownlee, $3,500. They reported no cash gifts on financial disclosure forms, records show, and repeatedly have declined to comment to the Trib.
“It's good that some people refused (Ali's) advances,” said Harrisburg activist Gene Stilp, who filed a complaint with the House Ethics Committee and state Ethics Commission. “Let's hope more of these cases come to light, where people did the right thing.”
Pennsylvania law allows elected officials to accept gifts of $250 or less without disclosing them. A legislator could take a $1,000 or more gift, if there were no quid pro quo, and report it to the Ethics Commission.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett team rails at pollster
- Poll shows Wolf’s lead over Corbett widening
- The Progress Fund awarded $2M federal grant
- Racino near Youngstown to carve out slice of Pennsylvania market
- Conservative legislator puts credentials on line in bipartisan medicinal marijuana effort
- Pennsylvania investigators get truck to aid in finding child predators
- Newlyweds guilty in Craigslist killing
- Demand for truck drivers soars in Western Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania to use lake sediment to bury Greene County coal waste pile
- Sandusky cover-up case unusually shrouded