3 children die in central Pa. farmhouse fire
Firefighters try to put out a early morning fire on Friday, April 4, 2014 outside Danville, Pa. The early morning farmhouse fire in north-central Pennsylvania killed three children, ages 2 to 13, authorities said. The Northumberland County coroner identified the victims as 13-year old Daniel Dissinger, 7-year old Gavin Dissinger and 2-year old Arthur Dissinger. The deaths were ruled accidental. The children's mother was at work at the time of the fire, Kriner said. He said a 13-year-old boy and 14-year-old girl managed to escape from the home and were treated for injuries that weren't life-threatening. Another child was staying at a friend's house overnight, he said. The home had almost completely collapsed by the time the first crews arrived, officials said. (AP Photo/The News-Item, Larry Deklinski)
Photo by AP
DANVILLE — An early morning fire on Friday in a farmhouse in north-central Pennsylvania killed three children, ages 2 to 13, authorities said.
The blaze was reported about 1:20 a.m. Friday near Danville, about 100 miles west of Philadelphia, officials said.
“It doesn't get much worse than this,” said Chief Butch Kriner of the Southside Fire Company in Riverside.
The Northumberland County coroner identified the victims as 13-year old Daniel Dissinger; 7-year old Gavin Dissinger; and 2-year old Arthur Dissinger. Their deaths were ruled accidental.
The children's mother was at work at the time of the fire, Kriner said.
A 13-year-old boy and a 14-year-old girl managed to escape from the home and were treated for injuries that were not life-threatening.
Another child was staying at a friend's house overnight.
The home was almost completely collapsed by the time the first fire crews arrived, officials said.
“It was all but in the basement by the time we got there, so I could not tell you where it started,” Kriner said.
The cause is under investigation.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.