Share This Page

Beaver County men accused of crimes during PSU drinking holiday

| Saturday, April 5, 2014, 7:13 p.m.

Two Beaver County men have been charged with a series of burglaries during State Patty's Day weekend on the Penn State campus in State College.

Monaca residents Jesse Hribar, 22, a Geneva College student, and Andrew Ronczka, 23, a University of Pittsburgh student, surrendered for arraignment at District Judge Carmine Prestia's office on Friday.

Both are charged with multiple counts of burglary and criminal trespass, as well as related crimes — including criminal conspiracy to commit burglary, theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property.

Attempts to reach them on Saturday for comment were not successful.

State Patty's Day, a student-devised drinking holiday, fell on March 1, drawing students and young adults to the area for a weekend of partying.

On March 2, police began responding to reports of thefts at a variety of apartments in the Meridian II building at 646 E. College Ave. Later, more incidents were reported at University Towers at 458 E. College Ave.

In reviewing surveillance video from the apartment complexes, police saw two men wandering the halls, testing doors and entering apartments. Video and still images were released to media, and according to Lt. Keith Robb, they “went viral.” On March 18, an anonymous tip was received from the defendants' hometown, identifying them and providing phone numbers.

Robb said that when police contacted the two men, they said they were expecting the calls and did not deny involvement.

According to court documents, both defendants admitted to stealing numerous items, including electronics such as iPods and Beats Pill speakers, cash and sunglasses.

Police said the total value of all the stolen items is more than $2,000.

Both were released after arraignment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.