Stepbrother slams McCord over 'single mom' ads
HARRISBURG — The stepbrother of Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Rob McCord accuses the Democrat of telling “half-truths” by portraying himself as the disadvantaged child of a single mother.
Daniel Silver of State College wrote in a letter to PennLive.com that McCord, who is state treasurer, fails to mention on his campaign website and in his TV ads that his mother remarried when McCord was still a boy. Silver said McCord's stepfather loved McCord and raised him as a son.
“To fashion a voter-friendly brand that portrays him as a disadvantaged child of a single mom and supposedly overcoming great odds ... McCord has told half-truths and dishonored the man he called ‘Dad,' ” Silver wrote. “Rob neither mentions or even acknowledges the profound contribution his Dad made on more than half his childhood. ... Why do we care? It's about character. A governor should have some.”
McCord's campaign fired back, saying McCord mentioned he had a “great stepfather” in an April 2 interview with the PennLive editorial board.
“I was raised by a single mom from the time I was 4 to the time I was 13. And I got to admit, by the time I was 11, I was lucky. By the time I was 15, I was fantastic. And she married a great stepfather, and my dad, who was a pretty epic character himself, became a great divorced father,” McCord said in the interview.
Silver wrote that McCord's mother, who divorced McCord's father when the boy was 4, remarried when he was 10.
“Is McCord being technically accurate saying he was raised by a single mom? Perhaps, for some period of time. Is he being forthright and telling it like it is? Not even close,” Silver wrote.
McCord is one of four Democrats running for the nomination to take on Republican Gov. Tom Corbett.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.