Paternos ignore 'history that actually happened,' NCAA contends in filing
Joe Paterno's relatives are attempting to rewrite history and ignore reality as they seek to overturn a $60 million fine and other NCAA sanctions against Penn State related to the Jerry Sandusky child sex-abuse scandal, NCAA attorneys said in asking a judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by the late Penn State football coach's family.
The NCAA's 64-page response was filed on Tuesday in Centre County. It argues the university willingly agreed to sanctions, including a temporary postseason ban and scholarship reductions, because Sandusky, Paterno's former defensive coordinator, was convicted of abusing boys, including some incidents at campus football facilities.
Paterno's family has sued to overturn the sanctions, arguing that Penn State was wrongly forced by the NCAA to accept the penalties that harmed the school, defamed Paterno's memory and affected the ability of his son and assistant coach, Jay Paterno, and others to find jobs. The NCAA voided 112 wins from Paterno's tenure that coincided with Sandusky's abuse of the boys, meaning Paterno is no longer recognized as the NCAA's winningest Division I coach.
The NCAA contends the lawsuit should be thrown out because the sanctions have nothing to do with the Paterno family and have helped the university regain its reputation.
“Plaintiffs do not like this success story because it relies on the history that actually happened, as opposed to the history that they wish happened,” the attorneys wrote.
The Paternos also take issue with the sanctions because they're based on findings by former FBI Director Louis Freeh, which they've disputed. Freeh was hired by the university to conduct an internal investigation.
The NCAA attorneys argue the Paternos wrongly “contend that the NCAA extorted an unwilling Penn State” into accepting the sanctions or that, “perhaps the NCAA and Penn State for some reason conspired together to defame the memory of a beloved coach.”
The family's attorney, Wick Sollers, said the latest filing “is an obvious attempt to delay the litigation and obscure the facts,” saying many issues the NCAA raised were decided in January, when the judge allowed much of the lawsuit to go forward.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Officials dissent on whether offices can prohibit, charge to photograph public record documents
- State court blocks release of emails between Freeh investigators, AG’s office
- ‘Free’ wine kiosk initiative costs state Liquor Control Board $300K
- State man, 77, gets 4 months for aiding son’s escape plan
- Officials file to end lawsuit against Penn State, NCAA
- LCB manager wins workers’ compensation fight over robbery
- Obama’s free community college tuition plan raises doubts
- New Pennsylvania law leads municipalities to rescind gun control measures