Marijuana gains ground in Pennsylvania Senate
In a round, silver tin presented to a panel of state lawmakers, nine ounces of pungent, federally approved marijuana offered cannabis activist Patrick Nightingale a reminder of how far he'd come, and how far he has to go.
“I've been sitting in a Senate committee, inhaling the scent of fresh marijuana,” Nightingale said. Later, he would call it “the most amazing thing,” an exciting moment for his cause, noting the 300 marijuana cigarettes were legal only for the patient next to him, Irvin Rosenfeld.
Nightingale, an attorney and executive director of Pittsburgh NORML, and Rosenfeld were among a half dozen advocates who testified before the Senate Law and Justice Committee on Tuesday about a proposal to establish regulations for medical marijuana in Pennsylvania.
The committee's chairman, Sen. Chuck McIlhinney, R-Bucks County, said he plans to bring the bill up for a vote in the next two weeks, the first vote of its kind on the issue. He thinks it will pass.
Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Forest Hills, said a majority of members support access to medical marijuana. Details, though, are under review.
“If the right bill with the right language is put on the floor, you're very likely to see passage in the Senate,” Costa said.
Its chances in the larger House of Representatives are less certain. Many members defer to the federal government on the issue, said Steve Miskin, spokesman for Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods.
Marijuana, a Schedule I drug, is illegal by federal standards and largely off-limits to researchers.
“Members believe this is something, state by state, we should not be determining on our own what is medicine,” Miskin said. “That is what the (Food and Drug Administration) does; that is their expertise.”
Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, who had said he would not sign off on medical marijuana without FDA approval, said recently he now supports researching cannabidiol, a non-psychoactive extract shown to be effective in pediatric seizure treatment. Corbett's proposal to permit cannabidiol research differs from the Senate bill, which would make other forms of the drug available to patients.
The Senate plan would allow physicians to prescribe marijuana to patients with certain illnesses, including seizure disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and cancer.
Patients with an ID card could obtain the drug from licensed dispensaries.
With a veto-proof majority in the Senate, Nightingale said advocates will lobby and educate House leaders. He said he suspects bill sponsors Sen. Mike Folmer, R-Lebanon County, and Sen. Daylin Leach, D-Montgomery County, are not likely to let the issue fail.
“They understand Pennsylvanians are suffering every day while politicians dither,” he said.
Melissa Daniels is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8511 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.