Wine bill gives hope to state bed and breakfasts
YORK — American Vintage Bed and Breakfast is next to Naylor Wine Cellars, but state law prevents the Stewartstown B&B from serving its neighbor's wine to guests.
“The rules are ridiculous. My guests can go over there and bring me a complimentary bottle, but I can't give them one,” said JoAnn Dalton, owner of the bed and breakfast.
A state House bill passed this month would change that.
Sponsored by Rep. Scott Petri, R-Bucks County, House Bill 244 would allow Pennsylvania bed-and-breakfast owners to give one bottle of wine produced by a licensed, limited Pennsylvania winery.
B&Bs and wineries are an integral part of the state's tourism industry, and many are within driving distance of each other, he said.
“My bill fixes an archaic and senseless law by enabling B&B operators who want to offer a complimentary bottle of local wine to their guests to do so without having to first obtain a liquor license,” Petri said.
It also will help the state's B&Bs compete with those in other states that advertise the complimentary beverages as part of lodging packages.
The measure passed the House without debate by a 200-1 vote and now goes before the Senate for approval.
Workers at Naylor Wine Cellars hope the bill becomes law.
“It's a boost for the B&Bs and wineries and just good for tourism across the board,” said Ted Potter, winemaker for the winery.
There are nearly 900 B&Bs and about 180 wineries that could benefit from the proposed change, according to the state Department of Community and Economic Development.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Progress Fund awarded $2M federal grant
- Pennsylvania allots $681M for cloud-based data storage
- Sandusky cover-up case unusually shrouded
- Altered fireworks, chickens found in Interstate 79 crash in West Virginia
- Newlyweds guilty in Craigslist killing
- State workers paying less than most for health benefits
- Conservative legislator puts credentials on line in bipartisan medicinal marijuana effort
- Poll shows Wolf’s lead over Corbett widening