Upper St. Clair family's efforts pay off as governor signs Down syndrome education bill
Gov. Tom Corbett signed a bill that requires genetic counselors and other types of health care practitioners to provide parents with educational information once the practitioner make a prenatal Down syndrome diagnosis.
The legislation became law last week thanks in large part to 11-year-old Chloe Kondrich of Upper St. Clair, who has Down syndrome.
Dubbed the Down Syndrome Prenatal Education Act, the law should encourage access to support services, First Call programs, resource centers and a state-funded early intervention program, as well as information about how a child with Down syndrome, a genetic disorder, will develop. The disorder causes intellectual disabilities and developmental delays.
Kondrich's parents, Kurt and Margie, have led the effort behind the law since their daughter was born in 2003. Kurt Kondrich left a job in law enforcement to take on an advocacy role. He serves on the Interagency Coordinating Council for Early Intervention.
“We are proud of Chloe and commend her parents for their devotion to early intervention efforts and becoming advocates for children affected by Down syndrome and their families throughout the Commonwealth,” said Patrick T. O'Toole, superintendent of Upper St. Clair School District, where Chloe is a student.
Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5815 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.