Share This Page

Judges split on bail for Philadelphia police officers in drug cases

| Monday, Aug. 4, 2014, 10:00 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — Three Philadelphia police officers charged with conspiring to rob drug dealers of more than $500,000 in cash and cocaine were granted house arrest on Monday, although two others were denied bail.

Those being released include Officer Linwood Norman, described as an enforcer who once dangled a drug suspect over an 18th-floor balcony as he demanded money.

“Mr. Norman's actions in this case are out of control,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Wzorek said as he fought the bail request. “We've got (him) selling three kilograms of cocaine while he's on the police department.”

However, U.S. Magistrate Timothy Rice said Norman and two others could be released. He found no immediate evidence that they had threatened witnesses after the investigation began two years ago and they were put on desk duty.

Most of the defendants face long prison terms if convicted of racketeering or a weapons charge. All have pleaded not guilty to charges that include kidnapping and civil rights deprivations.

The officers are accused of using gangland tactics to intimidate their targets. The officers allegedly bashed in someone's teeth and beat people in the head with a steel pipe.

The officers also routinely entered homes without a search warrant, at least once using a sledge hammer to knock down a door — after locking the owner in a jail cell overnight, the indictment said.

Rice denied bail to the officer suspected of being the group's ringleader, Thomas Liciardello.

Liciardello once pistol-whipped a man held in a motel room for several days so he could “score points in a bizarre contest with other officers to physically abuse victims,” Wzorek wrote in a court filing.

Defense lawyers questioned the credibility of the accusers, given their criminal backgrounds.

The city's district attorney questioned the credibility of the accused officers in 2012 and refused to use their testimony in court, a move that followed years of defense bar complaints and civil rights lawsuits. Prosecutors said they had tried to make a case for years, but could only do so after former officer Jeffrey Walker was arrested on home-invasion charges, and agreed to plead guilty and cooperate.

Defense lawyers, as they pushed for bail, said it was not surprising their clients waved weapons and used harsh tactics in their work pursuing drug dealers.

“He wasn't playing Pollyanna out there on the streets,” said Officer Michael Spicer's lawyer, Jimmy Binns. “All of these alleged robberies are in connection with arrests and searches and seizures.”

The police families who packed the federal courtroom Monday gasped when a judge first assigned to the bail hearings ordered Spicer held. The judge, Magistrate Richard Lloret, had offered to step down because he was a longtime federal prosecutor. After his ruling, all of the other defendants asked him to recuse himself. Rice then was brought in for the other hearings.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.