Share This Page

Husband arrested in Philly jogger's death

| Sunday, Aug. 10, 2014, 7:45 p.m.

PHILADELPHIA — The husband of a jogger found strangled in a park has been charged with her murder, police said on Sunday, days after they warned female runners to take extra precautions until the killer was caught.

Authorities announced the arrest of 48-year-old Christopher Murray at a news conference. His 46-year-old wife, Constance, was found dead on Tuesday in Pennypack Park in northeast Philadelphia. The mother of two had been out running the night before.

“The reality was he became a suspect early on and remained a suspect until he confessed,” Lt. Philip Riehl said.

Riehl said Murray has expressed remorse. “I think it was more of a rage incident more than premeditated,” he said.

Investigators say Murray trailed his wife in a car while she went out on Monday night, and the two began to argue. Police say Murray continued to follow her, and the pair went to a bench at the park where they continued to fight.

“She went up there voluntarily to talk to him about whatever was going on, and things went bad,” Riehl said.

Christopher Murray strangled his wife and left her body near the bench, police said. He called police early on Wednesday to report her missing, and a woman walking her dog found her body a few hours later.

Surveillance video showed Christopher Murray in his vehicle, and he was taken in for questioning, police said.

Riehl said aspects of his story didn't add up. He failed a lie detector test and then confessed, Riehl said.

Her headphones and cellphone were recovered in a nearby sewer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.