ShareThis Page

Special deputy told Gov. Corbett of 'inappropriate' emails, campaign manager says

| Sunday, Sept. 7, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

HARRISBURG ­— A special deputy hired by the Attorney General's Office made Gov. Tom Corbett aware of emails shared among his former staffers that “may have been inappropriate,” Corbett's campaign manager said on Saturday.

Campaign manager Mike Barley said the governor wanted to clarify comments he made to Tribune-Review editors and reporters during a visit to Pittsburgh, to set the record straight.

Corbett had said that he had no knowledge of the emails reputed to contain sexually explicit images, shared by staffers when he was attorney general, and that special deputy Geoffrey Moulton did not discuss them with him.

Moulton interviewed Corbett in May as part of a review of how the office handled the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse investigation. Moulton, hired by Attorney General Kathleen Kane, determined that Corbett did not slow that investigation because of his 2010 gubernatorial campaign.

“To clarify, the governor did not have any discussions with Mr. Moulton during the official interview regarding this matter,” Barley said in a statement. “After that interview concluded, Mr. Moulton told the governor that emails were uncovered during the investigation that may have been inappropriate.”

Moulton, a former federal prosecutor and law school professor, declined to comment.

He found the emails among an estimated 20 million deleted ones that investigators reconstructed, sources said.

The Trib has requested access to the emails through the state's Right-to-Know Law. A judge has stayed the release of the information without explanation.

Asked whether Moulton told him about the emails, Corbett initially told the Trib: “We did not get into that at all.”

Barley said Corbett “does not recall exactly how the emails were described by Moulton, other than it was made clear to him that they were inappropriate.”

In the statement, Barley said: “To be clear, the governor had no knowledge of these alleged emails while he was attorney general, nor has he ever seen them.”

Corbett was attorney general from 2005 to January 2011.

“(If) he would have known about any inappropriate emails being sent, he would have put a stop to that type of activity immediately,” Barley said. “He would never condone that type of behavior, and if these reports are true, he will be very disappointed.”

The judge who froze the Trib's request for the emails oversees a statewide grand jury. It's not known how the request got to his court. Grand juries are secret proceedings.

James Koval, a spokesman for the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, said Judge Norman A. Krumenacker III is expected to rule on whether to lift the stay when he concludes an unrelated trial.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.