ShareThis Page

Lawmaker wants to end politics at NASA

| Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 9:17 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Rep. Frank Wolf is a bit of a romantic when it comes to the space program.

He can still recall that the New England town where he worked as a lifeguard in his youth buzzed with excitement when Mercury astronaut Alan Shepard visited one day. After moving to Washington in the 1960s, Wolf impressed his parents by driving them past astronaut John Glenn's house. This spring, he marveled at the sight of the space shuttle Discovery flying over the nation's Capitol to retirement at the Smithsonian.

But now that U.S. astronauts ride Russian rockets to the International Space Station, a plan to return to the moon has been scrapped and a manned trip to Mars is at least 20 years away, Wolf, 73, believes NASA has lost its way.

“It's become very, very political, which it never used to be,” he said. “You really have the White House running this operation, and there are a lot of good people in NASA. And you know, many of them feel the same way that I do, although they can't really say anything.”

As the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees NASA's budget, the 16-term congressman from northern Virginia plays a key role determining the space program's trajectory. And lately, he hasn't been happy.

Wolf has pushed the Obama administration to move faster in choosing an aerospace firm to build a replacement for the shuttle. He's sparred with the White House over his demand that the administration limit cooperation with China on joint space ventures.

Last year, he authored legislation creating a panel of independent experts to review NASA's strategic direction. The panel must report its findings by the end of the year.

In September, Wolf co-sponsored a bill that would restructure NASA's leadership by creating a 10-year term for the agency's administrator rather than let the White House decide when to name someone new. The proposal is designed to insulate the space program from administration turnover that critics say drains money and delays progress.

Administration officials say the space-program cupboard isn't bare, thanks to passage of the bipartisan 2010 NASA Authorization Act. The legislation briefly extended the space shuttle program. It also establishes a “robust” commercial space initiative and calls for a manned mission to Mars.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.