Number powerless finally dips below 1 million
Published: Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, 8:54 p.m.
NEW YORK — Homes and businesses along the East Coast continued to face power outages on Tuesday caused by damage from Sandy, but the number of outages had dropped below 1 million for the first time since the storm hit more than a week ago.
Sandy's wind and storm surge toppled power lines and flooded areas that held generating equipment, knocking power out to more than 8 million at its peak.
About 930,000 homes and businesses remained without power as of Tuesday afternoon, the Department of Energy said in a report.
Nearly 350,000 customers in New York had no power as of 2 p.m. on Tuesday, government data showed, after peak outages of 2 million.
New Jersey remained the hardest-hit state, with more than a half million homes and businesses with no power, down from a peak of 2.6 million.
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc, the largest electric utility by customer base in New Jersey, said on Tuesday that 226,900 customers remained without power, down from a peak of 1.7 million. The company expects to have power restored to those customers by Friday, a spokeswoman said.
New York power company Consolidated Edison said it had 107,000 customers without electricity, out of 990,000 affected by the superstorm. About 20,000 of those customers cannot be reconnected to system until their electrical equipment is inspected, said John Miksad, senior vice president of electric operations for Con Ed.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Davis embraces new opportunity with Pirates
- NHL notebook: Bruins’ Lucic fined $5,000 for spearing
- Mail for IRS delivered to Squirrel Hill home
- Riverhounds squander 2-goal lead, settle for draw
- NFL notebook: Pryor will be cut if he’s not traded
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Frye: Commission discusses ‘second opening day effect’
- State Police: People injured in Parkway crash resulting from police chase
- Architecture photos show difference between drama, fact
- Area anglers recorded many top-ranked catches from 2013