Protesters continue campaign at presidential palace in Egypt
By Betsy Hiel
Published: Friday, Feb. 1, 2013, 9:22 p.m.
CAIRO — Protesters attacked the presidential palace here on Friday as the Arab world's most populous nation entered a second week of unrest.
Youths heaved Molotov cocktails and stones or shot fireworks over the palace walls, forcing a presidential guard to retreat until riot police fired tear gas, buckshot and water cannons into the crowd of more than 1,000.
One death and dozens of injuries were reported. Clashes erupted across Tahrir Square, and chanting crowds marched on parliament and the state television building.
The violence followed a day of peaceful protest against President Mohamed Morsy and the ruling Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic-based party that controls parliament.
Chaotic confrontations with police were broadcast live on Egyptian television. In one scene, police stripped and beat a demonstrator while an armored car fired into a crowd.
Anti-government protesters want a unity government, amendments to a new but controversial constitution, the dissolution of parliament and judicial independence. A growing chorus condemns the Islamic tenor of Morsy's eight-month rule.
Earlier in the day, Mohamed El Baradei, leader of the National Salvation Front opposition bloc and a Nobel laureate, wrote on his Twitter account that violence will continue until Morsy and the Brotherhood “listen to people's demands.”
Morsy's office responded with its own Twitter posts, accusing protesters of “attempting to storm the palace” and calling on the opposition to denounce the violence.
Many of the youths battling police are not controlled by any party, however — and some said the palace attack was in response to police kidnapping their comrades.
Egypt's top prosecutor has accused one such group, the Black Bloc, of terrorism and begun arresting its members. The bloc insists it is protecting demonstrators from Brotherhood attacks.
The thousands who turned out here and across the country on a rainy Friday were far fewer than in previous protests, but their rage against Morsy was no less fervent.
“You are not the protectors of religion, and we are not infidels!” one group chanted as it marched on the presidential palace. They spray-painted walls with slogans — “Liars in the name of religion!” and “Revenge!”
One demonstrator, Sherif Chalabi, 33, said the Brotherhood does not “care about anyone else, just themselves.”
“The Mubarak regime was bad, but the Morsy regime is even worse,” said Chalabi, a night manager at a luxury hotel.
Huda Fowzi said fellow protesters reject Egypt's Islamist-leaning constitution and want “a new government that represents all the Egyptian people.”
“If this is Islam, I don't want this Islam,” the 50-year-old architect declared.
Wael Hussein, 40, a tour guide, condemned the Brotherhood as a “huge block” on “the road of the revolution” and said Egyptians “don't want an Islamic regime, but a moderate regime.”
“I hope the American regime will stop the aid to the Muslim Brotherhood,” he added. “I hope they understand that the majority of the Egyptian people are moderate.”
Betsy Hiel is the Tribune-Review's foreign correspondent. Email her at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Western Pennsylvania engineer aboard missing Malaysian Airlines flight, employer says
- Analysis: Kesler still on Pens’ radar as Shero aims to bring back ‘Big 3’
- Pirates notebook: Volquez, Morton struggle
- Original tea partyers returning to GOP fold
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- College basketball notebook: WVU’s Staten, Iowa State’s Kane named 1st-team all-Big 12
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- 2 dozen injured as California school stage falls
- Penn State falls at Minnesota, rematch set for Thursday
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution