ShareThis Page

Egypt denies choosing ElBaradei as new prime minister

| Saturday, July 6, 2013, 11:57 p.m.
Getty Images
Reports of Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei being named vice president of Egypt swirled on Sunday, July 7, 2013.
Getty Images
FILE - JULY 6, 2013: ElBaradei, the former head of the UN nuclear watchdog, is named Egypt's interim Prime Minister, three days after Mohammed Morsi was ousted by the army. BERLIN - JUNE 26: Mohammed El Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, speaks at a conference on nuclear disarmament at SPD headquarters June 26, 2006 in Berlin, Germany. El Baradei urged all nations with nuclear weapons to disarm. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

CAIRO — A day of continued violence over the ouster of Mohamed Morsy as president ended with confusion over a new prime minister for Egypt.

Reports of Nobel laureate Mohamed ElBaradei's being named to the post were quickly denied by a spokesman for Adly Mansour, himself named interim president by the military after it sacked Morsy on Wednesday.

Tamarod, or Rebellion — the political coalition behind last week's enormous anti-Morsy demonstrations — announced the appointment of ElBaradei, former chief of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency, on Saturday.

Hours later, Egyptian officials said no appointment had been made and that several names are being considered. They said ElBaradei faces opposition from various political quarters.

ElBaradei is a longtime opposition figure — first to dictator Hosni Mubarak, ousted in a 2011 revolution, and then to Morsy and his ruling Muslim Brotherhood. Although well-known in the West for his U.N. work and opposition to the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, he is less known to average Egyptians; some opposition leaders dismiss him as a political opportunist who spent most of his career abroad with the U.N.

Earlier in the day, Islamist supporters of Morsy maintained two sit-ins in the capital. The Brotherhood called for pro-Morsy marches and warned of more bloodshed.

More than 30 people reportedly died in the latest clashes, including a Coptic Christian priest shot by Islamists in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula.

In a poor section of Cairo, angry residents buried victims of what they described as an attack by Islamist gunmen. Some mourners physically lashed out at a foreign reporter, blaming the United States for Egypt's turmoil.

Growing numbers of Egyptians accuse Washington of backing Morsy and the Brotherhood. Adding to their outrage, some U.S. officials have called for a review of American aid to Egypt because of the military's coup.

The U.S. Embassy, closed for the past week, has evacuated much of its staff and urged all Americans to leave.

Anti-Morsy forces — who brought 17 million or more demonstrators to the streets last week, ultimately forcing the military to act — said they plan more rallies on Sunday.

The mounting violence and political chaos has many Egyptians, and some analysts, fearing a repeat of Algeria in the 1990s. That country exploded in violence and terrorism when the ruling party and the military canceled 1991 elections won by Islamists; more than 100,000 people died over the next decade.

Dalia Ziada, director of the Ibn Khaldoun Center for Development and a leading women's rights activist here, said the Brotherhood “will not give up easily” after winning control of parliament and the presidency.

“Last year during the presidential elections, the Muslim Brotherhood said very clearly that if (Morsy) did not win and become the president, they would burn Egypt,” said Ziada, 30.

She predicts that “they will keep on attacking the people and killing civilians” but added: “I don't think it will take more than a day or two before it is all over.”

Others believe the Brotherhood can mount huge demonstrations despite some of its key leaders being arrested and sent to the same prison that holds Mubarak, whose 2011 ouster eventually put them in power.

Still, Ziada believes Egypt is “back on the right track” after the Brotherhood's “stealing our revolution.”

“For the first time, Egyptians know what we want. After the 2011 revolution, we only knew what we didn't want,” she said. “We want democracy, with equal rights and opportunities. We want to see great development in this country.

“Please tell the world this is not a coup,” she said. “It is a popular uprising, supported not just by the army but by Al Azhar” — Egypt's main Islamic university — “and the (Christian) church, the police and all the state institutions. … We were going to die, but we were saved.”

Betsy Hiel is the Tribune-Review's foreign correspondent. Email her at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.