ShareThis Page

U.S. next bull's-eye for ISIS terrorists, Kurds say

| Saturday, Aug. 16, 2014, 9:56 p.m.

KHABAT, Iraq — A Kurdish soldier looks through binoculars at the village of Hassan Sham, two miles down this dusty plain, where ISIS fighters are massed.

Behind him, the white tents of a refugee camp are empty.

A week ago, those tents sheltered 5,000 people who fled when ISIS — the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, widely described as “the new al-Qaida” — seized control of Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city, in June.

They hurriedly fled this refuge, some leaving behind their cars, as ISIS advanced on Irbil, the capital of Iraq's Kurdish region, 18 miles away.

American airstrikes have slowed ISIS's advance, to the relief of outgunned Kurdish troops — called peshmerga, or “those who face death” — manning this 600-mile battle line.

“Not only the airstrikes, but the attention of the world, signals to our population … that we are not alone,” said Shwan, a source close to a Kurdish military commander. He declined to use his full name.

“We like history, art and life. ISIS hates all that,” he said. “We want democracy, and they want the opposite. We respect human rights and minorities, and ISIS kills them.”

ISIS is a threat to America, too, he said.

“This is a world war against terrorism. For ISIS, the idea is not just to take over Kurdistan but the region, and then strike the United States and other places around the world.

“… You are the world's target.”

Fighting across northern Iraq has displaced at least 400,000 people, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross.

The flood of refugees, coupled with strained resources, is becoming an almost unmanageable humanitarian crisis, officials here concede.

ISIS — so brutal in Syria's civil war that al-Qaida disowned it — targets Iraqi Christians and Yazidis, massacring villages and beheading or crucifying captives.

Repeatedly displaced Christians swell the streets of Irbil's Ainkawa section.

Tens of thousands of Yazidis, an ancient Muslim sect that incorporates elements of other religions, fled the northern city of Sinjar and surrounding villages. ISIS surrounded more than 100,000 of them on a mountaintop, without food or water, until American and Iraqi airplanes dropped supplies and Kurdish fighters from Syria and Turkey secured an escape route this week.

Several thousand remain stranded, according to Sinjar Mayor Saleh Ahmed.

He said that “50 to 60 … old people and children who couldn't climb up the mountain” are trapped near ISIS lines. “They are waiting to be evacuated. Yes, they are a small group, but they are humans also.”

Outgoing Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said ISIS killed 80 Yazidi men in Kawju, a village 15 miles southwest of Sinjar.

The men refused to convert to Islam, and ISIS executed them at a school where they had separated the village's children, women and elderly, Sinjar's mayor said.

On the battlefield, American airstrikes hit ISIS forces around Mosul's dam, Iraq's largest and the source of water and electricity for much of the north; peshmerga are struggling to take it back.

“I think the U.S. military intervention is very, very important for the protection of the only successful area in Iraq, which is the Kurdistan region,” said Alan Attoof, a political analyst in Irbil.

“The most important reason to keep Kurdistan safe is that it has become the haven for … Christians and Yazidis, and other minorities and refugees from Syria.”

It has strategic and psychological importance to the United States, he said: Apart from the enormous investment of lives and money in Iraq since 2003, American forces have protected the Kurdish north since the first Gulf War in 1991.

“You have your U.S. Consulate here, and it has become a haven for other diplomats from Baghdad when they evacuated,” Attoof said.

At the front line in Khabat, ISIS and the peshmerga trade artillery and mortar fire. ISIS captured modern American equipment when six Iraqi army brigades fled Mosul; the Kurds have few heavy arms and ran low on munitions until American resupply flights began last week.

“ISIS is not a local group; it is a regional and international group,” Attoof said. “(They) have militants from all over the world — from the U.S., the United Kingdom, from Europe, from Chechnya — from everywhere.”

Its ranks include “former commanders in Saddam's army (who) are very well-trained and know the country inside and out,” said Shwan. “It has a lot of fighting experience here in Iraq and Syria. We are faced with an enemy who has fighting skills, is well-equipped and willing to die.”

Refugees described how the peshmerga quickly withdrew in Sinjar, leaving them defenseless. Kurdish officers said they ran out of ammunition and lacked other essential equipment.

Meanwhile, ISIS's victories are producing more volunteers and support elsewhere.

Sympathizers in London distributed ISIS fliers, and those in Germany attacked Yazidi immigrants; when ISIS supporters rallied in The Hague, the mayor there canceled a counter-demonstration.

A Canadian was killed while fighting for ISIS in Iraq, according to media reports; other media tell of European women joining the terror group. On Twitter, a British ISIS member boasted of holding Yazidi women as slaves.

If ISIS maintains a base in Syria or Iraq, Attoof said, “of course, it would be so easy for them to export terror anywhere they want in the world.”

Said Shwan: “If ISIS takes Kurdistan, you will have lost the only pillar of democracy in Iraq. ISIS represents a threat to all of us, particularly the United States.”

Betsy Hiel is the Tribune-Review's foreign correspondent. Email her at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.