ShareThis Page

Fisher-Price's Little People finally inducted into National Toy Hall of Fame

| Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016, 11:00 p.m.

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — At long last, a big honor for the Little People.

After seven times as finalists for the National Toy Hall of Fame, the tiny tenants of Fisher-Price's house, barn and school bus were enshrined Thursday.

They were joined by the swing and Dungeons & Dragons in the hall's class of 2016.

“People have called us the Susan Lucci of the toy world,” Fisher-Price spokeswoman Brenda Andolina said. The East Aurora-based toy maker sent a busload of employees to the ceremony, albeit a lower-key one than when the much-nominated soap actress got her Emmy.

“One of their challenges has been, frankly, that they've been kind of little and they've been easier to overlook or postpone for our national selection advisory committee,” said Chris Bensch, vice president for collections at The Strong National Museum of Play in Rochester, N.Y. He said their relatively limited audience of 1- to 5-year-olds has been another hurdle.

Since being introduced in 1959, more than 2 billion Little People have been sold. The earliest tubular wooden versions evolved over the years to the plastic figures with arms, legs and dimensional faces of today.

“Moms have always loved Little People because it's really wholesome. ... It's all about sharing, caring, nurturing,” Andolina said.

The company works to preserve that affection, she said, even changing the audio chip in the Little People SUV recently after a working mother complained that one of the toy mom's phrases — “Time for yoga and a smoothie” — missed the mark.

“Somebody called us out that that wasn't the best portrayal, it didn't resonate, so we reconsidered it, and it was an easy change for us to make,” Andolina said.

Fellow inductee Dungeons & Dragons is, in some ways, the adult version of Fisher-Price Little People, Bensch said.

“It essentially is a vehicle for empowering them to make up stories,” he said of the 1974 role-playing game created by Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson. It has a well-known celebrity fan in actor Vin Diesel, who has called it the “training ground for imagination” and said it helped him embrace the mythology of the “Riddick” movies.

Curator Nic Ricketts said the game's mechanics have lent themselves to computer applications, and that has had an impact on electronic games such as “World of Warcraft.”

The swing was recognized for its longevity over centuries. Versions of the staple of modern playgrounds and backyards are depicted in ancient cave drawings in Europe, carved figures from Crete and ceramic vases from early Greece, the hall of fame said.

“Though the equipment has evolved with the centuries, the pleasure children and adults find in swinging has hardly changed at all,” curator Patricia Hogan said.

Anyone can nominate a toy but to become a finalist, it must have lasted across generations, influenced the way toys are designed or played with and fostered learning or creativity through play. The finalists are chosen by historians and curators at The Strong and sent to a panel of expert judges who decide the winners.

This year's honorees were chosen over nine other finalists: Care Bears, Rock 'Em Sock 'Em Robots, Transformers, Nerf foam balls, Clue, Uno, pinball, coloring books and bubble wrap.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.