Neo-Nazi pleads guilty to slaying prison guard
SALT LAKE CITY — A Utah inmate known for the neo-Nazi tattoos that cover his face and body pleaded guilty on Wednesday to murdering a prison guard in 2007.
Under a plea deal with prosecutors to avoid a possible death penalty, Curtis Michael Allgier, 33, agreed to a life sentence without the possibility of parole while pleading guilty to aggravated murder and other charges.
Authorities said Allgier killed Stephen Anderson, a prison guard who was shot with his own gun while escorting Allgier to a doctor's appointment on June 26, 2007.
Prosecutors approached defense attorneys with the plea deal about three weeks ago, after Anderson's family members said they didn't want the case to drag on any longer and that they would be satisfied if Allgier spent the rest of his life in prison, Salt Lake County District Attorney Robert Stott said.
Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 5.
Anderson, 60, of Bluffdale was a 22-year employee of the Utah Department of Corrections.
Anderson's family members were in court on Wednesday.
“We recognize that it's very merciful and forgiving of them.” Richard Gale, Allgier's attorney, said of their decision. “Some of the lesser charges, he had issues with, but ultimately he decided if they're not seeking the death penalty, he would agree.”
Allgier pleaded guilty in 3rd District Court to felony counts of disarming a officer, aggravated escape, aggravated robbery and possession of a firearm by a restricted person. He pleaded no contest to three counts of first-degree felony attempted aggravated murder.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Gray wolf decision reversed
- Ghostly snailfish found at record depth
- FBI’s 2001 anthrax attack investigation questioned
- Supreme Court won’t stop gay marriages in Florida
- Bush officials gave CIA wide latitude on interrogation tactics
- Traffic camera use upheld in Ohio
- Ohio judge frees 2 men in 1975 murder as then-teen witness recants
- House ethics panel defers campaign finance investigation of New York Rep. Grimm
- Despite hack attacks, cybersecurity bill stalls in Congress
- Organizers believe as many as 25,000 demonstrated in Washington in support of shooting victims
- Senate disclosure revives legal debate on interrogation techniques