Share This Page

Obama, Romney campaigns accuse one another of lies

| Sunday, Oct. 7, 2012, 8:40 p.m.

WASHINGTON — The campaigns of President Obama and Mitt Romney traded sharp accusations of lies and distortions Sunday as the race, roiled by last week's debate, headed into its final month.

The Romney camp released a new TV ad accusing Obama of “not telling the truth about Mitt Romney's tax plan.” It charged Obama with distorting the plan by asserting on the campaign trail and during Wednesday's first presidential debate that the Republican candidate would raise taxes on middle-class Americans as part of a $5-trillion tax cut that mostly would benefit the wealthy.

Romney supporters repeated the charge on the Sunday talk shows.

“We know it's not true what they're saying about his tax plan,” Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. said on “Fox News Sunday.” Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who said during the Republican primaries that Romney was running a “fundamentally dishonest campaign,” came to his former opponent's defense.

Gingrich said, “The charges on the tax cuts are just plain wrong.

“Mitt Romney walked over him,” Gingrich said of Obama's debate performance.

But Obama aides and supporters pressed their assertions that Romney's tax plan doesn't add up and that he misled voters.

“It was a masterful theatrical performance. It was fundamentally dishonest for the American people,” Robert Gibbs, an adviser to Obama's campaign, said on ABC's “This Week.” “This was what he used to do in private business,” Obama adviser David Axelrod said on CBS' “Face the Nation.” “You have the ‘closer' at Bain Capital, and the basic theory is say whatever you need to get the deal, and that's what he did that night.” He said Romney was “dishonest in his answers” and delivered “a Gantry-esque performance,” a reference to the fictional, dishonest evangelist Elmer Gantry.

The Romney campaign sought to build on the momentum staffers believe they gained from the former Massachusetts governor's strong performance in the first of three presidential debates.

“The debate was a reset of this campaign,” Ayotte said. She described it as “an opportunity for the American people to debunk the myths created by the Obama campaign through false advertising about Governor Romney.” Republican Mike DeWine, attorney general in the battleground state of Ohio, said: “This race fundamentally changed Wednesday night in Ohio and across the country.” “The president couldn't defend the last four years,” DeWine, a former U.S. senator, said on CNN's “State of the Union.” “Maybe that's not because he's not a good debater. We know he's a good debater. He couldn't defend the last four years because you can't defend it. You can't defend not getting the job done.” Democrats said Obama was not happy with his performance and would improve in the upcoming debates.

“I think the president understood that he hadn't performed up to his own expectations pretty quickly after he got off the stage that night,” Gibbs said.

Axelrod said Obama “did plenty of homework” before the debate, but wasn't ready for Romney distortions of his own positions.

“I think he was a little taken aback at the brazenness with which Gov. Romney walked away from so many of the positions on which he's run, walked away from his record and that's something we're going to have to make an adjustment for in these subsequent debates,” Axelrod said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.