Civil rights, labor leader lauded
KEENE, Calif. — President Obama's stop in this remote and sparsely populated San Joaquin Valley town was about as far off the campaign trail as a candidate could be so close to an election. But his message as he dedicated the Cesar E. Chavez National Monument was not without political significance, as he honored the legacy of a civil rights and labor leader whose “si se puede” credo was an inspiration for his own historic campaign four years ago.
Speaking on the 187-acre property that served as both home and operational headquarters for Chavez and his United Farm Workers movement, Obama said Chavez's tenacity on behalf of a new generation of workers was part of “the story of who we are as Americans,” meriting such a tribute alongside other national monuments such as the Statue of Liberty and the Grand Canyon.
“It's a story of natural wonders and modern marvels, of fierce battles and quiet progress. But it's also a story of people, of determined, fearless, hopeful people who have always been willing to devote their lives to making this country a little more just and a little more free,” Obama said.
Monday's event was the sole official stop on a three-day, campaign-heavy trip, sandwiched between fundraising stops in Los Angeles and San Francisco. The designation means that taxpayers fund a portion of the president's travel, while his campaign pays costs associated with his political travel.
Even without the banners reading “Forward,” his 2012 re-election slogan, and Marine band anthems replacing the usual campaign soundtrack, the electoral significance was clear.
Arturo S. Rodriguez, the current president of the United Farm Workers, noted in his introduction of the president that Obama adopted Chavez's “belief in ‘Si se puede,' as his own 2008 campaign credo, ‘Yes we can.' ”
“And when he was elected, he used his power to say yes,” Rodriguez said, before listing the appointment of Latino Cabinet secretaries (both of whom attended Monday's event), a first Latina Supreme Court justice and his support for a deferred action program that allows young undocumented workers to remain in the United States.
With time an increasingly precious commodity in a race that has shown new volatility after a long period of stasis, Obama is leaning on all the levers available to him for an advantage, including perhaps his biggest weapon: incumbency.
The dedication of the Cesar Chavez National Monument came not through legislative action but executive authority under the Antiquities Act. Though White House officials said it was a process long in the making, the formal dedication came as Obama's campaign shifts toward a more intensive get-out-the-vote phase of its operation, one that includes a major focus on the Latino vote and will be augmented by labor muscle.
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who attended the dedication and is also a national campaign co-chairman for the president's re-election effort, said it was a fitting moment because of how Obama fits into Chavez's legacy.
“I think that the president, a former organizer, was inspired by Cesar Chavez much as I've been inspired by Martin Luther King. And I truly believe that the president understands how important Cesar Chavez has been to giving him the opportunity to be president of the United States and help America a more open, more equal and more equal country,” he said.
Obama, who admitted Sunday that his performance in last week's debate was lacking, said in his remarks Monday that the nation could draw inspiration from one particular facet of Chavez's decades of advocacy for farm workers.
Chavez “worked for 20 years as an organizer without a single major victory,” the president said. “But he refused to give up. He refused to scale back his dreams. He just kept fasting and marching and speaking out, confident that his day would come.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Regulators approve tougher rules for Internet providers
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders
- EPA ripped for evading request for information
- Los Angeles rookie officer claims shooting victim grabbed his gun
- Hillary Clinton may have broken federal record-keeping laws, New York Times reports
- Devoted California couple dies within 5 hours of each other
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform