Maine town waits with 'bated breath' in prostitution case
KENNEBUNK, Maine — Residents of this seaside community will have to wait for at least the weekend to learn which of their friends and neighbors stand accused of giving business to a fitness instructor charged with running a prostitution operation out of her Zumba studio.
The police department declined on Friday to release any of the more than 150 names of suspected clients because of an appeal pending before the state Supreme Court.
The delay prolongs the curiosity of town residents, who have heard that the list could include lawyers, law enforcement officers and some well-known people.
“We're hearing that there are selectmen, there are policemen, that there are firemen — people that we're going to know in town,” said Elaine Nicholson. “So everyone is, like, waiting with bated breath.”
Alexis Wright, a 29-year-old fitness instructor from the nearby town of Wells, has pleaded not guilty to prostitution, invasion of privacy and other charges for allegedly accepting money for sex and secretly videotaping her encounters.
Her business partner, Mark Strong Sr., a 57-year-old insurance agent and private investigator from Thomaston, pleaded not guilty to 59 misdemeanor charges.
Their lawyers did not return messages on Friday.
Searches of Wright's studio and office turned up video recordings of sexual acts, billing information and meticulous records about clients, according to court documents.
Kennebunk police have begun issuing summonses to Wright's suspected johns on misdemeanor charges of engaging a prostitute. The first set of names was supposed to be released on Friday, but police held off because of the legal action.
A lawyer for two men on the list filed an appeal on Friday to challenge a decision by a district judge who declined to halt the public release.
“We believe very strongly that their names ought not be released. The mere releasing of their names will have devastating consequences in a case in which the government, we believe, will have great difficulty proving,” said the lawyer, Stephen Schwartz.
Schwartz took the case to the state Supreme Judicial Court and vowed “to fight to the end for our clients.”
The appeal asked the court for an expedited hearing on the appeal. The earliest that can happen is Monday.
“We fully expect that they won't be convicted, but the damage is done once the horse is out of the barn,” he said.
The prostitution charges and ensuing publicity shocked this small town, which is well-known for its ocean beaches, old sea captains' mansions and the neighboring town of Kennebunkport, home to the Bush family's summer compound.
Some people say they had their suspicions about Wright, but others were totally in the dark about the energetic dance instructor who introduced many local women to Zumba, a Latin-flavored dance and fitness program.
Alison Ackley, who participated in Wright's class, said she had no inkling that she might have been leading a double life.
“She was very professional. She was an amazing dancer,” Ackley said. “I thought she was a little, not risque, but a little flirtatious with a couple of the male participants in the class. But it's Zumba. You're there to have fun. I didn't think anything of it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- House demands details of Taliban detainees swap for Bergdahl
- 15 buffalo that escaped from farm killed in upstate N.Y.
- Footage of protesters walking on flag sparks strife at Georgia university
- Magma chamber spied under Yellowstone volcano
- Florida fraternity members spit on disabled veterans at retreat
- Residents guide geese out of town
- Hostility at VA lingers, panel told
- Administration turns up heat on Medicaid expansion
- ‘Organic’ tag on water-raised produce raises ire
- HIV cases tied to drug use multiply daily in Indiana
- Bomb threat clears Statue of Liberty