Suspect nabbed in Mich. shooting spree
WIXOM, Mich. — Police who arrested a suspect in a Michigan shooting spree that targeted moving cars and resulted in at least one injury were led to the man's home based on one of thousands of tips, authorities said on Tuesday.
The suspect was taken into custody Monday night in Wixom, the Detroit suburb where the shootings began, a police task force investigating the four-county spree said.
“Why did he do it? I don't know. I don't know if we'll ever know,” said Ingham County Sheriff Gene Wriggelsworth.
He said a tip — one of close to 3,000 that have come in — led authorities to the man's home. He declined to disclose what the suspect told investigators.
The task force said in a written statement that the man drove a vehicle that matched the description of the suspect's car provided by a shooting victim. Authorities also seized potential evidence at his home, the task force said.
At least one gun was seized, said Donald Dawkins, Detroit spokesman for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
The man had not been charged by Tuesday afternoon, and it was not clear when charges might be filed. Local and federal authorities were discussing whether the case should be pursued in state court or federal court. Wriggelsworth said he wanted federal prosecutors to take the case.
The shootings began Oct. 16 and stretched from Oakland County west to Ingham County. The targets in the 24 reported incidents were mostly cars traveling on roads near Interstate 96, which connects Detroit and Lansing. Only a handful of shootings occurred on the interstate.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- Federal officials: Dallas nurse free of Ebola
- Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
- Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
- Internet providers asked not to take ‘fast lanes’
- Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
- White House may enhance security
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Judge orders W.Va. agency to release pollution data
- Man shot from behind, Wecht’s autopsy finds
- Missouri officials faulted by feds for ‘selective’ probe in police shooting death