Dems wait for Pelosi decision on minority leader's post
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was the first woman speaker of the House before her party lost its majority in 2010 midterm elections. Getty Images
Photo by Getty Images
WASHINGTON — Nancy Pelosi, who served as the first woman Speaker of the House of Representatives from 2007 through 2010, will announce on Wednesday whether she will seek another term as the chamber's Democratic minority leader.
“I will see you 10 a.m., tomorrow, those of you who are interested,” Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol on Tuesday when asked if she wants to continue to head her party in the House next year.
Pelosi, a leading liberal, has been minority leader for the past two years.
Her four-year reign as House speaker came to an end shortly after the 2010 elections that saw Republicans take the chamber and subsequently elect John Boehner as speaker.
Senior Pelosi aides said it remains unclear what she would do. “House Democrats are waiting to hear,” said Rep. Steve Israel, head of the House Democratic campaign committee.
Israel and Pelosi helped House Democrats post a net gain of a half-dozen seats in last week's elections. But they fell short of the needed 25 to take control of the chamber.
If Pelosi decides to seek another two-year term as House Democratic leader, she is virtually guaranteed that members will give it to her, Democratic aides and lawmakers said.
If Pelosi, 72, decides to step down, she is likely to be replaced by the chamber's No. 2 Democrat, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer.
Some financial market analysts have been anxiously awaiting Pelosi's decision.
Analysts have said if Hoyer, who is seen as a moderate, were to become Democratic leader, it could become easier to reach a deal to cut entitlement programs, a key to reaching a bipartisan agreement on long-sought deficit reduction.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.