In first news conference since re-election, Obama addresses challenges
By The Los Angeles Times
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012, 9:56 p.m.
WASHINGTON — In his first formal news conference since March, President Obama on Wednesday showed himself ready to go toe-to-toe with Republicans over fallout from the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, even as he left open the door to compromise over year-end tax increases.
Speaking in the East Room, the typically cool Obama displayed a rare flash of anger in defending Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, whom some Republicans have accused of spreading inaccurate information about the Sept. 11 attack on the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi. Rice is a potential pick for secretary of State in Obama's second term, although some GOP senators have sworn to block her nomination.
Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., were picking on an “easy target,” Obama said. If they “want to go after somebody, they should go after me.”
The tough talk was a clear contrast from Obama's core post-election message: He's ready to deal with House Republicans to avoid the tax hikes and spending cuts that are scheduled to take effect in the new year, which could smack the economy back into a recession. Obama sought to pressure Republicans to act now on a Senate bill that would extend the current lower tax rates for most taxpayers, but suggested he was willing to bend on one of the key sticking points: how high to boost rates on wealthier taxpayers.
“With respect to the tax rates, I just want to emphasize: I am open to new ideas,” the president said.
Obama offered hints about his strategy for pursuing immigration reform, which he said would come early in his second term and suggested he could improve his outreach with Republicans, including his vanquished opponent, Mitt Romney, whom he awkwardly praised for doing “a terrific job running the Olympics.”
He weighed in on the scandal involving former CIA Director David Petraeus and Gen. John Allen, commander of U.S. and international forces in Afghanistan, which has become an enormous distraction just as Obama had hoped to focus on the federal budget.
“I have no evidence at this point from what I've seen that classified information was disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on our national security,” he said.
The president's remarks and shifting tone reflected the mix of issues that await him. As Obama lays the groundwork for his second term, he will look to a familiar cast of characters on Capitol Hill for aid with legislation, a potentially legacy-making tax and budget deal, and nominations to replace Cabinet secretaries.
The fight over one post is brewing even before Obama names his choice. Graham and McCain have pounced on talk of Rice's possible nomination and used it as a cudgel in the fight over when the White House knew what prompted the Sept. 11 attack that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.
Republicans have accused the administration of downplaying the incident for political reasons when U.S. officials initially described it as a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic film rather than a terrorist attack.
Obama will have to try to keep the heated rhetoric from souring his first order of business — negotiations with Republicans to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff, the tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to take effect in the new year unless the White House and lawmakers compromise.
Halting middle-class tax hikes would limit the threat, Obama said, adding, “We could get that done by next week.”
The Senate has passed legislation that would preserve current rates for income up to $250,000 for families and $200,000 for individuals.
Obama is scheduled to meet with congressional leaders from both parties on Friday.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has made an opening offer that would extend all of the expiring tax rates for another year while Congress and the White House work on a broader overhaul of the tax code, with the goal of closing loopholes and using the revenue to lower all tax rates.
The White House has been cool to Boehner's offer, and Obama on Wednesday referred to the 2010 extension of the Bush-era tax cuts as “a one-time proposition.”
But he did not draw a red line on returning the tax rate on the wealthiest Americans to Clinton-era levels, which could mean he is open to a rate between the current 35 percent and the scheduled increase to 39.6 percent on the highest incomes.
Obama suggested his next priority will be immigration, noting the key role Latinos played in his re-election. He won more than 70 percent of the Latino vote. Key Republicans, anxious to increase their support from that fast-growing slice of the electorate, have signaled they are open to a comprehensive overhaul.
The president said such a package would have to create a pathway to legal status for people living in America unlawfully, with measures requiring applicants to learn English and pay back taxes and a fine. It would have to include strong border security and serious penalties for companies that hire undocumented workers, and protect young immigrants whose families brought them to the United States illegally but who have grown up here and stayed out of trouble, he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.