Justice Alito defends court’s ruling in Citizens United
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, November 17, 2012, 8:22 p.m.
Updated: Saturday, November 17, 2012
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is defending the court's 2010 decision in the Citizens United case that helped fuel hundreds of millions of dollars of spending by independent groups in the just-concluded campaign season.
Alito told roughly 1,500 people at a Federalist Society dinner last week that the First Amendment protects political speech, whether from an individual or a corporation. His comments to the overwhelmingly conservative and Republican crowd were part of his broader analysis of arguments put forth by the Obama administration in recent years that Alito said would curtail individual freedoms in favor of stronger federal power.
He said opponents of the 5-4 decision have conducted an effective but misleading public relations campaign by stressing that the court extended free speech rights to corporations.
Alito rattled off the names of the nation's leading newspapers and television networks, all owned by corporations and possessing acknowledged rights to print and say what they wish about politics and government.
“The question is whether speech that goes to the very heart of government should be limited to certain preferred corporations; namely, media corporations,” he said. “Surely the idea that the First Amendment protects only certain privileged voices should be disturbing to anybody who believes in free speech.”
The justice in his speech on Thursday dealt with high court cases involving religion, private property, surveillance, immigration and health care.
Taken together, Alito said, the views put forth by the government begin to suggest a vision of society “in which the federal government towers over people.” He noted that in several cases, not a single justice endorsed the Obama administration's arguments.
- FBI kills Florida friend of Boston Marathon bombers
- Cask ahoy: Winery tests ocean aging
- House GOP undeterred by rulings on abortion
- Michigan woman’s rape, cancer claims investigated as scams
- WVU baseball players spring into action in tornado-ravaged Oklahoma
- 3-D printer helps save boy with birth defect
- Pennsylvania trooper injured in North Carolina accident
- Food stamp amendment rejected by Senate
- Grim search, rescue efforts from twister near end in Oklahoma
- Terrorists given new identities allowed to board commercial flights, watchdog finds
- Okla. senators embrace disaster aid after opposing Sandy relief bill
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.