Industry says EPA plan to soften pollution rules is insufficient
WASHINGTON — In response to industry complaints, the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed softening its rule to cut mercury and other pollution from new coal-fired power plants.
An industry trade group says the changes, which include a slightly higher level of allowable mercury emissions, don't go far enough to ensure coal remains an alternative to natural gas. The EPA released its revised rule Nov. 16.
“I'm not sure it's sufficient to fix the problem, even for new sources,” said Scott Segal, director of the Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, a utility group that includes Atlanta-based Southern Co.
While Segal said utilities were reviewing the proposal, he said the revisions would still constrain a utility's ability to build a new coal plant.
EPA's mercury rule is one of several environmental regulations Republicans in Congress and industry lobbyists have argued will raise electricity costs and hurt the economy. The Obama administration has said the health benefits outweigh the costs.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.