Records: FDA didn't issue meningitis warning for 684 days
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2012, 6:10 p.m.
BOSTON — The Food and Drug Administration took 684 days to issue a warning letter after uncovering infractions that potentially could harm patients of the pharmacy at the center of the deadly meningitis outbreak, according to newly released documents.
The New England Compounding Center chastised the FDA in a letter dated Jan. 5, 2007. The center told the agency that its response time was nearly 18 months longer than the FDA's average response, according to letters released under an open-records request.
“We believe that FDA's nearly two-year delay in issuing the Warning Letter contradicts FDA's rhetoric regarding the asserted risks associated with our compounded products,” center co-owner and chief pharmacist Barry Cadden said in the letter, released by the FDA under an open-records request.
The FDA acknowledged in a letter to Cadden dated Oct. 31, 2008, that there had been a “significant delay” in its response but insisted that the delay “in no way diminishes our serious concerns about your firm's operations.”
The FDA has asked lawmakers to clarify its authority to oversee large-scale drug compounders such as NECC. But several Republicans have argued that the agency has the authority that could have prevented the outbreak.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 34 people have died and 490 have been harmed after Framingham, Mass.-based NECC shipped a tainted steroid — methylprednisolone acetate — to medical facilities throughout the United States. The steroid is typically used to ease back pain.
The national outbreak stretched to two clinics in Pennsylvania, where officials reported one case of fungal meningitis at Allegheny Pain Management in Altoona. A second clinic in the Pittsburgh area that received tainted medication, South Hills Pain and Rehabilitation Associates, did not report any cases of the illness.
— Trib Total Media contributed to this report
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tea Party flap averted fraud probe by IRS, Justice, emails show
- AC/DC not disbanding, lead singer Brian Johnson says
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- US Airways’ pornographic tweet won’t cost anyone a job
- Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
- Vermont Senate OKs GMO labels as industry insists genetically modified crops are safe
- Nevada standoff over cattle ends as feds back down
- Census director defends changes, denies questions altered to inflate Obamacare success
- Supreme Court voids overall contribution limits to political candidates
- 1986 Warhol self-portraits up for sale
- Federal judge strikes down North Dakota abortion ban