CDC rips exposure to smoke at airports
Ventilation at five major airports with designated smoking areas does not protect passengers from the health risks of secondhand smoke, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned.
The CDC, in its first study comparing air quality at airports with and without smoke-fee policies, finds pollution levels adjacent 39 inches to smoking areas five times higher than levels at airports that entirely ban smoking. Levels inside smoking areas, including bars and restaurants, were 23 times higher than at smoke-free airports.
“Significant secondhand smoke exposure is going on. ... These are unnecessary dangers for airport employees and passengers,” says Tim McAfee, director of CDC's Office on Smoking and Health. He says the report shows smoking areas are not ventilated enough, adding that a ban on all indoor smoking is the “only effective protection” against secondhand smoke.
McAfee says there's “no safe level” of secondhand smoke exposure. The CDC says it causes heart disease and lung cancer in non-smoking adults and is a known cause of sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, respiratory problems, ear infections and asthma attacks in infants and children. It says even brief exposure can trigger acute cardiac events such as heart attack.
Although federal laws have banned smoking on all domestic and international commercial airline flights, they do not require airports to be smoke-free. Most airports with designated smoking areas are located in states without smoke-free laws or are exempted from such laws.
Five of the 29 largest U.S. airports, accounting for about 15 percent of U.S. air travel last year, allow smoking in designated public areas: Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport, McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas, Denver International Airport and Salt Lake City International Airport.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Construction of giant bridges sparks curiosity, high demand for public tours
- ‘Fast, Furious’ pistol was sold to gunman in foiled Texas terrorist attack
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- Minn. dentist laying low in slaying of lion
- Fires’ fury unabated in California
- San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Blankenship defense wants Upper Big Branch explosion evidence kept away from jury
- Planned Parenthood official says no profit from fetal organs