Record revenues reported by Amtrak
WASHINGTON — Amtrak continues to rely on government subsidies but served more travelers in the past year than ever before and posted record ticket revenues, its leader told lawmakers on Wednesday.
“While there are still plenty of challenges ahead, the basics for success are definitely here and Amtrak is doing well,” Amtrak President and CEO Joseph Boardman told members of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee.
Amtrak, set up 41 years ago, has never functioned as the for-profit corporation it was intended to be. Last year, in response to criticisms of the railroad's performance, Boardman introduced a five-year strategic plan intended to streamline the organization, reduce costs and boost revenue.
“When we're done, Amtrak will look more like a business and less like a government agency,” Boardman told lawmakers. “Customers will find that our system is easier to use, more convenient, timelier and more comfortable.”
The new plan involves reorganizing Amtrak into six business lines, with each line held accountable for revenue goals and losses. The reorganization should be complete by the end of 2013.
Wednesday's hearing to examine the plan was the committee's fourth hearing on Amtrak this year. The panel plans to reauthorize rail programs next year.
Amtrak's federal funding formula expires in September, and the railroad is looking for federal help to build a $151 billion high-speed rail line between Washington and Boston. It wants to undertake a $6.5 billion renovation of Union Station.
Previous hearings have focused on losses in Amtrak's food and beverage service, the railroad's inability to compete with the private sector for commuter rail operating contracts, and Amtrak's continued reliance on federal subsidies, which last year totaled $1.4 billion.
Committee Chairman John Mica, R-Fla., a critic of Amtrak, plans two more hearings before the end of the year.
“Sometimes our role is one of oversight, sometimes of prodding,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Stoned volunteers test drug, alcohol effect on driving
- Witnesses added for Benghazi hearing
- House GOP balks on young immigrants bill