TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Senate: Get forces out, end war in Afghanistan

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012, 6:22 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Reflecting a war-weary nation, the Senate voted overwhelmingly on Thursday for an accelerated withdrawal of forces from Afghanistan after more than a decade of fighting.

The strong bipartisan vote of 62-33 sends a clear message to President Obama and the military as they engage in high-stakes talks about the pace of drawing down the 66,000 troops there, with a White House announcement expected within weeks.

Although the vote was on a nonbinding amendment to a Defense policy bill, its significance could not be discounted amid the current discussions.

Thirteen Republicans, including Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, the top GOP lawmaker on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, backed the measure.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., its chief sponsor, argued that al-Qaida is stronger in other parts of the world and that nation-building in Afghanistan has gone off track. His measure endorsed Obama's timetable to withdraw all combat troops by the end of 2014 but pressed for a quicker pace, without specifying how that would be achieved.

“It is time to end this war, end the longest war in United States history,” Merkley said during Senate debate.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Thursday that the United States will need to keep troops in Afghanistan even after the combat mission ends in 2014 because al-Qaida remains in the country and is trying to strengthen its influence.

Panetta would not say how many American troops he thinks will be needed to conduct that mission, nor did he mention a time period.

The overall defense bill authorizes $631 billion for weapons, ships, aircraft and a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel.

The White House has threatened to veto the legislation in its current form, citing limits on the president's authority in handling detainees at the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and restrictions on cuts to the Air National Guard and the Air Force Reserve.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Obama administration delays decision on Keystone XL pipeline
  2. Wyatt Earp gun sells for $225K at auction
  3. Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
  4. Scientists achieve cloning advance for use in treating diseases
  5. Social Security drops debts older than 10 years
  6. Drought uncovers fatal crash scene
  7. Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
  8. Casino sues gambler Phil Ivey, claiming $9.6M cheat
  9. Tea Party flap averted fraud probe by IRS, Justice, emails show
  10. Obamacare estimates beaten by 1M
  11. Imam’s influence detailed as NYC terror trial begins
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.