Share This Page

Effort renewed to change Pa. electoral-vote tally

| Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

HARRISBURG — State Senate Republican leader Dominic Pileggi on Monday renewed his call for Pennsylvania to revamp the way it awards electoral votes, using a method that would have given GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney eight of the state's 20 votes.

The Delaware County lawmaker invited fellow senators to co-sponsor a bill similar to his proposal last year that divided leaders of the state's GOP and ultimately withered on the vine. Democrats quickly criticized it as a partisan scheme to benefit Republican politicians.

Pileggi advocates breaking away from the traditional winner-take-all policy — used by all states except Maine and Nebraska — and replacing it with a system that divides the electoral votes between the candidates based on the share of the popular vote they receive.

In the Nov. 6 election, President Barack Obama, the Democratic nominate, beat Romney with 52.1 percent of the popular vote, winning all 20 electoral votes.

Pileggi's latest plan would award two electoral votes to the statewide winner of the popular vote. Unlike last year's plan, which would have awarded electoral votes based on the results in each of the state's congressional districts, the new proposal would apportion electoral votes based on the percentage of the statewide vote each candidate received.

Any fractional vote would be awarded to the statewide winner, said Pileggi's spokesman, Erik Arneson.

Had the proposal been in effect this year, Pileggi said, Obama would have won 10 electoral votes and Romney eight — not nearly enough to change the outcome of the national election but eight more than Romney won.

The “advantage of this system is clear: It much more accurately reflects the will of the voters in our state,” Pileggi said in his co-sponsorship memorandum.

Jim Burn of Millvale, the state Democratic Party chairman, called Pileggi's proposal “the ultimate sour grapes.”

“Instead (of) trying to pass partisan legislation that only helps Republican politicians at the expense of Pennsylvanians, Republicans should focus on helping the middle class — something they have failed to do.” Burn said.

Gov. Tom Corbett, who supported Pileggi's original proposal last year, had not seen the new plan and could not say whether he supports it, the Republican governor's spokesman said.

“When we do, we'll review it,” said the spokesman, Kevin Harley.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.